Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • Ken explained he worked to develop some initial comments, Martin also helped providing some.
  • Martin explained that in line 26, they basically talk about Attributes and Relationships as different types of things. It seems to him that they could be combined, thus Relationship is one type of Attribute, rather than having a whole separate parallel discussion. There seems to him that a Relationship type Attribute could be associated with whatever additional metadata might be necessary to fully describe a Relationship.
  • Tom commented that database technology for long time has distinguished between Attributes and Relationships. Partly because there are two subjects in a Relationship and only one in an Attribute. Ken asked if it is not enough of a reason just to have two separate paths for managing them. Tom argued that adding legal opinions does not seem right to him.
  • Martin explained that the primary topic of this DIACC document is Authorization, Tom said he has to have a look at that.
  • About line 28, Martin pointed out that there is a big hole over all system, what it is going to take for emergent digital authoritative attribute sources.
  • Ken added that he would agree with this even if it is public agencies and public sectors, organization would become the authoritative sources for a lot of Attributes.
  • Tom said that use/business cases are a good idea.
  • Ken mentioned they should provide an overview in this document, giving the benefits of doing this to anyone, specifically to public agencies.
  • About line 29 it was added to “Consider including a discussion of ‘client’ versus ‘server’ approaches during implementation”. Tom pointed out that Martin is not going to win this discussion against them. Ken stressed that the idea is to at least have a discussion about this.
  • Ken asked the IAWG to go to him if there is any question or comment about the spreadsheet. Following that, if there is not a resolution there will be a 3rd and final set of discussion on the 25th, because these comments need to be into DIACC by July 2nd.
  • It was added that MDL mDL on the 25th is the same time of this meeting.