...
Finalize proposed text (if any) regarding use of "presentation attack detection" (PAD.)
KC: background just an email question: does KI require PAD to approve CSP at IAL2? cc: David T.
RQ: NIST does not require PAD currently, thought the letter might be asking if KI was doing anything more.
MK, MH motion – approved.
To change SAC in 63 a nd b to reflect optional nature of PAD, and if used to assess as indicafted.
Confirmation of other non-substantive changes to criteria to be included in the package to be submitted.
KD: Asks Richard to confirm misc changes.
RW: Can be ready for next week. 5 sets of errata
KD: will vote next week to complete package for submission.
Other Business:
MK: Any further UK response? KC: Still on holiday. Allison did respond from vacation and will connect next week. MK: add to agenda for next week please.
KD: Australia? KC: did have 1-on-1 with Jon Thorpe. Very high level official. Supportive of Kantara's goals for interop and also they are using NIST standards. Hoping companies don't have to go through same process multiple times for different countries. Looking for KI to provide some leadership in these areas. KD: excellent–may influence other countries.
RW: just modified criteria (for PAD?) – sanity check of revised language. Ken OK with it, JJ too but would like to have KI "lean forward a bit to credit companies who implement it." KD: We can vote next week.
Next Meeting: August 26 to finalize the criteria change package for submission to Kantara review.
Ken adjourned the meeting at about 1about2:51PM 01PM US Eastern.