...
- Richard Wilsher went through this draft during the meeting: KIAF-1450 SP 800-63C Service Assessment Criteria v0.04.0.xlsx
- Richard Wilsher mentioned that criteria that apply to Federation Authority was completed, now it is necessary to go back to IdPs and RPs.
- Additional requirements to Federation Agreement: Testing and the frequency of re-assessment to ensure ongoing conformance requirements are being added, even if they are not part of the source text. Ken said that the Board would in essence, look for a recommendation from IAWG and unless there is a very significant business reason not to go with that recommendation, they would go with that recommendation, they are not the technical experts. Richard W. added that this is the reason why CSPs and RPs are being encouraged to work in the sub-group
- Fundamental requirement: Assessment no longer than one year.
- It was commented that it is assumed that if the assessment criteria changes (if Kantara makes the changes), it should probably trigger re-assessment as well. Ken answered that it should be checked in the annual conformance review.
- Row 50. Richard said that if it is needed to recommend a maximum period between these periodic re-assessments, that would be three years. Every year Kantara has to say, are you meeting up your three-year obligation?
- Row 50. #0330 – “where the vetting is performed”.
- Richard said there are three questions: Should this requirement be made such that they have to be vetted prior to participation? Is it periodically? To what extent does one allow hundred percent conformant to be found subject to correctness action for an acceptable time period?
- Ken suggested to add a note answering these questions: Should we make this requirement prior participation? Regarding the assessment, 1 off or do we do it periodically, e.g. yearly? to what extent we define sufficiency of conformance? Richard W. added a note stating those aspects.
- Nathan commented that the Self-assessment part (column R) was bothering him in extreme. Does the source text allow self-assessment? Richard said not, it actually excludes the possibility of self-assessment by Federation participants. When you consider this text here, a federation could vet each participant. It does not allow self-assessment; it would be inconsistent with Kantara.
- Ken´s suggestion (My vote: “As Necessary” for Testing, and “SHALL be done” for frequency of re-assessment”), raised no objection.
- Richard W. proposed to go through Martin’s comments and to address SATO comments.
- Richard W. said that everything in green is what has been already resolved.
- 292 was agreed.
- Martin comments:
...