Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Meeting notes: 

Administrative items:

Ken Dagg having emailed he would be slightly delayed, IAWG Vice-Chair Martin Smith called the meeting to order at about 1:07PM (US Eastern), and called the roll. It was noted that the meeting was quorate. 

Minutes approval:  Mark King moved approval of the draft Minutes of the IAWG meeting of Aug 19 . Mark H seconded. The minutes as distributed were approved unanimously.

Staff reports and updates: ED Kay Chopard–today talked with UK contact.  Had , who said they had a good relationship with Colin.  But "K former Kantara ED Colin , but that "Kantara is a mystery organization."  Need clarification obv. KC-- we can participate in more than one UK stakeholder group. They are planning to HAVE CERT PROCESS SO recommend we respond to latest. They encourage responses, to get balance against lots of indiv negative responses.  KD: any indication of knowledge of past contribs. KC: no, but may have meant Colin no as K.  Mark K: will send q's on their latest, not draft but It seems we need to get them a clear picture of the scope of Kantara's activities. UK contact said they welcome participation in their stakeholders groups, but don't want to overburden with keeping up with multiple stakeholder sub-groups. Kay assured her Kantara had resources and interest to participate wherever we could be relevant. They are planning to have a certification process, and Kay recommends we respond to the current call for comment to stay engaged. She said they encourage responses from identity-focused organizations to balance against lots of comments they are receiving from individuals opposed to any government involvement in identity. Ken D. asked if our contact had indicated any knowledge of past Kantara comment contributions. Kay said no, but that maybe they did not count input received from Colin as having come from Kantara as an organization.

Mark K. I will send some questions on the latest UK draft, not as a proposed Kantara response but just to point out issues we should be aware of. 

RW: should I talk to them when I am in UK?  Mark K: no prob. KC: Richard W.  Will be in UK soon. Should I try to meet with them? Kay C.: I don't think we need an in-person meeting, but we do need to make sure they realize Colin /=KI. May also be confusing C and Ruth as is not the only expert in Kantara.  They may also have the idea that Colin and Ruth Puentes were representing Kantara Europe.  KDKen D.: I am willing to give this one more try, we We had been on pause b/c because of lack of positive impact of past comments submitted. Maybe a new face (i.e. . We have been responding if govt is a member or might be. Felt UK was not likely.  , Kay) will also help trigger them to take a fresh look at Kantara. For background: our policy has been to respond to requests for input if the requesting government is a Kantara member, or might become one. We had judged that UK joining Kantara was not likely. In the past, OIX was on their board and that may have discouraged KI access.  Sept 13 deadline. . . .KC: that's why she said keep it short. JJ: greater Kantara access. Bottom line: we will try to provide some comments on the current UK draft.  

Kay C.: the response deadline is September 13.  That may also be one reason our UK contact suggested keeping comments brief.  

Jimmy J.: I am concerned about their lack of familiarity with KIKantara. I know we have briefing materials, ; should we try to present that ? KC – will present at EIC next month. 

Action:  Mark K to send his input. 

LA:  first meeting yesterday. Look to the UK program's board? Kay C.:  I will be presenting at next month's European Identity Conference (EIC) drawing from our standard Kantara overview briefing materials. 

Chair Dagg then invited the new Kantara Assurance PM, Lynzie Adams, to introduce herself. Lynzie A:  I started this week, and look forward to getting more involved . Worked with K prev.  Natl Dist Atty Assn MOved to SC at University. MPA in progresswith IAWG and Kantara generally very soon.  I worked with Kay C. previously when I was living in the Washington DC area, supporting the National District Attorneys Association. Since moving to South Carolina I am pursuing a Masters in Public Administration, which I expect will be very useful in my new role at Kantara

LC reports and updates:  Ken –  Ken D.– not much to report. 

Ken  Ken D. reminded WG participants that Kantara staff is ready to help them publicize their newsworthy activities via the @KantaraNews Twitter handle. Requests can be sent to Ken D or Kay C.

Discussion:

RW displays all-together spreadsheet.  Red text changed since last formal publication. 

In COSAC, no RED. 

IN OPSAC, 

martin says: lets do CACs and PAD. 

Richard starts line-by red line. One minor item in OPSAC.Ken D. asked Richard W. to lead the group through the various revisions to the criteria for 800-63-3 certification to be submitted for Kantara review and publication.

Richard had combined all proposed changes ("comparable alternatives", PAD-related, and errata) on a master spreadsheet which he displayed on-screen to the WG.  He then led the group through the proposed changes to the current criteria, which were displayed in red. 

There were no notable changes in the COSAC. 

In the OPSAC, there was one minor item with respect to which group agreed with Richard's characterization as a "non-material" change  (i.e., not requiring full public review for Kantara approval.) 



63A --

#80 – ok

#177  (CACs) – OK

...