...
Is the scope too narrow, too broad, or appropriate, bearing in mind other components may may address details out of scope for this document?
...
- Ken commented that Scott has sent some comments to the IAWG mailing list.
- Structure: Ken said that he found the general structure good but some of the sub-sections are not in the right section, in particular in the functional descriptions, where there are texts that belong to core concepts.
- Scope: Ken pointed out that there is lack of liaison function with other frameworks. Martin stressed that it would be good to see some kind of comparison with other frameworks.
- Scott commented that he has been involved in the Federal PKI Certificate Policy WG, and they have been discussing about automating the registration of device certificate, but the big question is how you would determine who is accountable for the device.
- Terminology: Some issues were raised in relation to digital identity. Colin added that in relation to terminology it is suggested ISO alignment. Ken said that he found multiple terms used for the same concept, they should refine the definitions or remove the terms. Also, he found that some terms are used before they were defined, such as digital identity.
- Ken commented that he is developing the comment log to submit to DIACC according to the format they have required.
- It was agreed that Ken Dagg would send the comments to DIACC and he will be the contact person.
Update and way forward on KIAF 1050 - Overview
- Ken and Richard have received inputs from JJ and Ruth.
- They will coordinate the next draft and send it to the IAWG shortly.