Note | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
These minutes are in DRAFT formdraft minutes have not yet been approved by the IAWG. |
Attendees:
- Colin Soutar
- Shin Adachi
- Ben Wilson
- Pete Palmer
- Bob Pinheiro
- David Wasley
- Richard Wilsher
- Tom Smeddinghof
- Jason Sedio
- Patrick Curry
- Sampo Kellomaki
- Nigel Tideschi
- Richard Trevorah
- Lena Kannappan
- Dave Temoshok
- John Bradley
- Frank Villavicencio
- Brett McDowell
- Joni Brennan
1) Roll call
- Quorum achieved
2) Review of action items/follow ups from our last call
(all past minutes can be found here http://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/display/idassurance/Meetings+and+Minutes)
...
- Suggestion: have one single review of all of the gathered comments
if people have follow on they can send over email earlier - Joni to discussed issue tracking methods
- Patrick - How does iaf relate to PIV I activity ISO 29115 NATO Identity Directive. ID Proofing and proofing interoperability?
Are we covering enough of the proofing to ensure other nations are aware of the IAF work (non-technical) - IAWG should produce and analysis of how the PIV works are comperable. Some one needs to own it as a deliverable. Call members feel there is value in this proposal. Map across the schemes has value especially at higher levels of assurance. PIV I is not yet publicly available.
Request that David T let us know when that work is out for review.
4) Vote on two motions
(the referred documents are available here:http://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/display/idassurance/Working+Drafts)
...
- Ben Wilson (DigiCert) moves / Patrick Curry (Clarion Identity) second
- Colin Soutar (CSC) abstains
- No Discussion or Objections
- Motion APPROVED
5) Roundtable discussion on Pro-forma and/or Donated Legal Agreements for identity federation
– Tom Smedinghoff (guest speaker)
- Attorney with law firm in Chicago, co-chair of Federated ID Legal Task Force.
- Started in 2009 regarding the need to address the legal side of issues. We have efforts underway with in the task force. There is a potential problem of definitions.
- Goal: To identify all of the legal issues involved in IdM legal structure models out there or proposed structures reviewing contract language* Historically - contracts have been needed and have not been available to all players.
- Do we wish to play a role of helping a CSP get off the ground? One concern is NOT to provide legal advice but to provide technical based feedback to contracts.
- IAWG could help in the review of the documents. There would be high value in a type of legal checklist - here is a set of things that need to be addressed 'legaly'
- People who have interest should sign up for the list serv (http://www.abanet.org/dch/committee.cfm?com=CL320041)
6) FORG status and next steps
- Rich Furr
- Ran out of call time. Tabled for next call.
7) Any other business
- None