Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

Kantara Initiative Identity Assurance WG Teleconference

Table of Contents
maxLevel3
minLevel3
typeflat
separatorpipe

 

Info

DRAFT Meeting Minutes - IAWG approval requiredIAWG approved on 21 November 2013

Date and Time

Agenda

  1. Administration:
    1. Roll Call
    2. Agenda Confirmation
    3. Minutes approval: IAWG Meeting Minutes 2013-10-31
    4. Action Item Review
    5. Staff reports and updates
    6. LC reports and updates
    7. Call for Tweet-worthy items to feed (@KantaraNews or #kantara)
  2. Discussion
    1. Status of DC F2F IAWG 13 November 2013
    2. Status update on Resilient Trust Network sub-group progress
    3. Richard Wilsher's Antecedent Theorem thread 
  3. AOB
    1. Modular IAF paper status
  4. Adjourn

 Attendees

Link to IAWG Roster

As of 1 July 2013, quorum is 5 of 9

...

Info

Meeting achieved quorum

Voting

  • Myisha Frazier-McElveen (C)
  • Rich Furr (V-C)
  • Andrew Hughes (S)
  • Richard Wilsher
  • Bill Braithwaite
  • Scott Shorter
  • Matt Thompson
  • Cathy Tilton

Non-Voting

  • Matt Woodhill
  • Kenneth Myers

Staff

  •  

Apologies

  • None

Notes & Minutes

Administration 

Minutes Approval

IAWG Meeting Minutes 2013-10-31

Motion to approve minutes of 2013-10-31: Rich Furr
Seconded: Matt Thompson
Discussion: None
Motion Passed 

Action Item Review

See the Action Items Log wiki page

Staff Updates

LC Updates
  •  No LC meeting this period
Participant updates
  • Andrew reported that he has been assigned as the liaison from IDESG to Kantara.

Discussion

DC F2F IAWG 13 November 2013
  • Joni sent the info for the session to the list - very limited space so please RSVP to Joni
  • Morning is FCCX discussion
  • Afternoon is digging into the Modular IAF
  • Please send written comments to Myisha or Joni to read into the meeting
Status update on Resilient Trust Network sub-group progress
  • Work will pick up on 2014Q1
Richard Wilsher's Antecedent Theorem thread 
  • 'Current relationship' and 'affiliated relationship' criteria in the 800-63-2 IAF mapping require clarity on 'antecedent' data
  • 'Enterprise antecedent' == 'affiliated relationship' are covered in the FB Supplemental Guidance
  • Furr -  thinks that it will be difficult to map this to 800-62-2 because it was developed by the FBCP working group
  • Furr - please refer to the Federal Bridge guidance doc for the definition of 'antecedent data' - only applies to LOA2 LOA3 (equivalent to LOW and MEDIUM FBCA levels)
  • Furr - in the prior 9 years the individual must have gone through a face-to-face identity proofing by a qualified individual
  • This is not at odds with 800-63-2, but 800-63-2 does not have specific guidance related to antecedent data - that's why the FBCA did the work to write the guidance document
  • Furr - in Enterprise case, the Department of Homeland Security requirement to complete I-9 data by Human Resources dept - this is acceptable for use as antecedent data
  • Furr - if non-Enterprise case - can use identity verifiers (Lexis Nexis, Experian, Equifax etc) - they will build a set of 7 KBA questions that the individual must pass (4 out of 5) within 2 minutes & fallback processes that on failure the individual must go face to face with a Notary
  • Wilsher - all the guidance will fit within the IAF
  • Wilsher - the FBCA guidance is jurisdiction-specific but IAF should be non-specific to jurisdiction - the FBCA guidance specifics should go into a US Federal Profile
  • Issue is: should Kantara put that level of detail in the SAC? e.g. the I-9 is a US Process so should not be in Kantara SAC
  • Need to ensure that what is introduced into SAC does not break implemented arrangements/agreements
  • If the level of detail in SAC is high-level it should work - the specific implementation could fit within
  • Wilsher will draft material for antecedent data for  LOA2/LOA3 on this and submit it for review (does this go into 45 day review? or IAWG first?)
  • After discussion: material will go into SAC draft for 45 day review directly

AOB

Modular IAF paper status
  • Andrew gave a quick overview of the current status of the paper
Discussion on 'non-PKI' LOA
  • Cathy requested clarification on the term "LOA3 non-PKI"
  • This is a FICAM designation - will only recognize PKI credential that falls under the Federal Bridge PKI scheme

Attachments

 

 

Next Meeting

...