...
- Richard W. stressed that it is not only a set of criteria which defines what is required, but make discrete statements and evaluate if they need clarification.
- It was asked what the assessors need into this process. RW Determine making a claim that meet the requirements conformity or not. We are Concern Reading the Richard W. pointed out that assessors´s concern is that when reading the statement with SHALLs and determine that the provide to the service meets the requirements, there might be a policy or practice statement
...
- .
- Mark commented that it would be good to structure the claims in a useful way.
...
- Richard W. suggested to break the source doc. down, identify the requirements text and make a number of discrete
...
- statements.
...
- For example in 5.1.7.1 there are 4 discrete requirements
...
- , so the CSP
...
- is aware on what
...
...
- they need to show to be compliant.
- Scott highlighted that we should focus on a criteria clearly identified list of what are the sets of requirements, get them all clearly articulated that can be evaluated or assessed.
...
- We need to use whatever structure to there is to formally express the content that can be evaluated in a rigorous way.
63-3 specific we are going 62-3 OP SAC as the ongoing international -3 approval process
...