Date
Apr 06, 2016
...
| Time | Item | Who | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4:05pm | Roll Call | Andrew Hughes |
|
| Approve Minutes | Andrew Hughes | Eve Maler made a motion to approve the March 23, 2016 minutes as presented. The motion was seconded by Mark Lizar. There were no objections. The motion passed. | |
Administration
| Executive Director/Staff Update
Voting
| ||
| Operationalizing the Kantara Theme and Collaboration | Discussion on 'innovation' ideas for DGs RP DG: most interesting is setting a set of requirements that GSPs need to meet. Actual service assessment criteria they need to meet have been designed by audtiors and TSPs without regard for what the requiring parties want. The area of requirements is of interest since the Gov't of Canada became involved in Kantara. Idea is to start a RP Discussion Group to discuss the requirements. Some of the work already done by eGov would help kick start the discussion. The rollout of the EMV might be an opportunity to leverage the discussion. Another potential entry point would be trust frameworks. Possibly invite CSP’s customers to the groups; create a membership campaign with aggressive tactics. In the style of "member-get-a-member" campaigns. HIA WG: the WG will be focusing on the patient identity ecosystem. Focusing on discovery and directories. 200 patients a day die from misidentification, that's a flight a day. IDM Professional Association: is it time for Kantara to create this association? Build a body of practice knowledge for practitioners. It is likely this association will start, should it be Kantara? Trust Services in EU: Starting to look at Trust Frameworks Interoperability; an area to keep an eye on. Will consent receipts add value to Trust Services? How would this transition through a conformance program? | ||
Update on Group IP Analysis Project | Status update on Covenant-style agreement Background: Trust Services and Connected Life by IPR on spreadsheet (please find this document here: Working Drafts) Per Colin Wallis there is no further progress to report on right now. | ||
| WG Project Status Updates | UMA Dev Project Eve reported that the group is working on the CCICADA white paper proposal. She isn't sure that the UMA Dev WG has formally requested funds from Kantara at this point. An outline is complete with a rough draft being fleshed out over the month of April. It was suggested that Mark may be able to share his white paper and feedback with Eve. CIS Project Mark reported that CISWG placed funding requests for Real Consent & Consent Receipt; awaiting funds. He also reported that the CCICADA project received feedback today. The MVCR was not well explained, needs more. Regarding the funding, Mark noted that the WG doesn't have the resources to do what they are trying to do, will need to make a decision to work on one profile for a Consent Receipt or work on a larger specification for a Consent Receipt. IAWG Project Ken reported that the group is developing a Statement of Requirements for professional resources. If approved by the IAWG this will be routed through the Leadership Council first for approval prior to the Board's review/approval. UMA Legal Project Eve noted that the UMA Legal project is the development of model definitions and model clauses to accelerate prep frameworks. UMA was asking for funding to help an IDE to assemble or create the clauses or clauses that exist. Ken noted that this funding has been approved. Eve also noted that this ties into a conference event that UMA is involved called Digital Contracts, Identities and Blockchain at MIT on May 23-24, 2016. Hardjono, Hazard, Maler are leading the event. The event is invite only. HIWG Project , however, if registrations don't reach the max Eve will supply the details. This may be an event for Kantara to "sponsor". Eve will send the details to Colin and Andrew. | ||
| WG Updates | Andrew noted that we are continuing with the bullet point updates on the LC wiki. These brief points can be posted by yourself or send them to Andrew for posting. UMAWG Eve reported that UMAWG has a 2016 roadmap which is exciting, maybe disruptive. Shows that this is a vibrant technical space. She noted that the Conformance program discussion is alive. And Roland Hedberg, on behalf of HEART, is implementing a test suite for UMA (security profile). CISWG Mark reported that they are getting ready for IIW. The group is under-resourced right now for some of their ambitions of the NBCR spec. The goal is to have a push and call to action for the conformance profile which can be used for the test use case (online consent). A big driver is the User Submitted Terms and what is happening with Customer Commons at IIW. The group is interested in a couple of use cases. Mary noted that there are a number of folks in the group with entities who would like to do pilots which would be significant. Mary is now the active Chair for this quarter. Lots of EU interest for MVCR for GDPR. HIAWG CERN is presenting to IAWG tomorrow. eGov
|