Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Date

2020-01-10

...

Non-Voting

...

Time

Item

Who

Notes

 mins
  • Roll call
  • Agenda bashing

Jim P

Welcome to the new Group Everyone. jim pasquale reminds us that the focus of the WG is personal information

  • Updates on proposed or possible projects discussed:
    • Consent Receipt v2 (??)
    • Information Sharing Dashboard (Iain)
    • Personal Data Record (??)
    • Intent Casting (Iain)
    • Information Sharing Agreements (John)
    • Purpose of Use Taxonomies (Ken)
  • Nominations for officers
    • Rules of the road for WG 
    • Rules of the road for project teams
  • Minimum nominations required:
    • Chair
    • Vice-Chair (or Co-Chairs)
    • Secretary (if no nominations, Jim moves that Co-chairs alternate capturing notes)

jim pasquale encourages participants to use the blog section of the WG to communicate and share. This enables newcomers to understand how the WG deals with various terms and definitions and concepts.


 min

Motion to approve prior minutesNot quorate

MOTION: To approve all and any outstanding meeting minutes requiring approval.

Moved by: 

Second: 

Discussion: 

Motion: 

0 minNews about new implementationsAll0 minProcessing feature requests for v.next specification work
  • Re-engaged work Being done on GitHub, do we stay with it and multtle through the learning curve, or go back to Confluence (here), This is a big question the group needs to answer.
    • 11/14 - What are the top-level Categories 
    • 11/14 - How will they define: ie Bugs/Enhancements/New Specs
      • Tom Jones & Vitor know of some predefined lists and would look at them
    • 11/21 Jim's suggested in order to discuss the open items/issue/Et al the group use the following process
      • Items can only be discussed if the person who entered the item/issue/Et al is on the call using a chronological order first in first out (FIFO)
      • Should no-one with an open item be on the call the workgroup will move to other open issues, AKA Catorogy needed, developing, agreeing on, and implementing them for GitHub use and Beyond.

 5 minNews and HappeningsJimMe2B Alliance Webinar Series addresses the most pressing issues facing consumers and businesses in the security and privacy arena. Join us for the inaugural webinar in the series.V. next contributions

The survey indicates that all contributors have agreed to move 1.1 to v.next. It can't be done officially until time period expires.

jim pasquale recommends that we break out the various sections of work in progress in the minutes by project and/or by issue so that it can be dealt with on a more granular or specific basis, rather than one large section about edits.

0 minNews about new implementationsAllNone mentioned
0  minDemo status updateall

iainh1 NA (Unlicensed) agrees to do a JLINC demo for the first February Meeting.

0 minutesFirst meeting of the month demoallFeb. ???0 minSpecification update approach

See a flowchart version of this here:

https://share.mindmanager.com/#publish/b-DWOcuKGnVY1PXBKXTpL0-DQOeqmZMGfGUAPiC5

0 minWG Charter operational structureJim

John Wunderlich suggests that WG meetings are for reporting back and coordinating between projects. But this begs the question about how the projects will self-organize to be both effective and transparent. i.e. do projects want project managers, leaders, managers, rapporteurs, contributors, editors, etc.

jim pasquale WG also needs to ensure that the WG is aware of status and can help address issues or roadblocks as they arise. Maybe separate project pages in Confluence as a start.

 min

Upcoming events update

All
40 minAOB


Next meeting

*** Next call 2020-01-23 10:30 am Eastern DAYLIGHT Time

https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/323930725

  • MOTION: To adjourn 
    • Moved: John 
    • Second: James
    • Discussion: None
  • Motion carry 

...