Due to the multi-community nature of the Notice & Consent work , there are active inputs from multiple communities of interest which require inputs there is a requirement to explore what a clear separation of powers between the various parties and the governance ecosystems this work pertains too. At the moment, a separation of powers is not defined in this this context so, this is also hard to use with out more digging and more research into this context.
- Hyperledger Consent Lifecycle Project has exploring the work continuing in the newly setup ToiP governance community, in which Digital Ledger Consent technology might be suited.
- Key elements for Separation of Powers should be considered by the parties, these can include;
- Kantara Requirements:
- Review by LC and perhaps Kantara ISO - BOT Liaison Committee
- what ever approach for separation of powers is taken, it should be flexible so that future SDO's, industry and trade associations, or standards and blockchain communities can feel comfortable with the approach chosen
- that the Notice&Consent group is scoped to focus on the legal requirements and agnostic to specific group or community requirements
- legal meaning the OECD Guideline, EU Convention 108 +, ISO 29184 ( and ISO/IEC 27560 Privacy technologies: Consent record information structure)
for international conformance with national and regional privacy laws
- legal meaning the OECD Guideline, EU Convention 108 +, ISO 29184 ( and ISO/IEC 27560 Privacy technologies: Consent record information structure)
- Kantara Requirements:
...