Versions Compared

Old Version 3

changes.mady.by.user Former user

Saved on

compared with

New Version 4

changes.mady.by.user Former user

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Date

2018-07-05

Status of Minutes

...

  • Kartik Venkatesh

Quorum Status


Meeting was <<<>>> not quorate


Voting participants

...

Time

Item

Who

Notes

4 mins
  • Roll call
  • Agenda bashing
Former user (Deleted)

5 min
  • Organization updates
All

Please review these blogs offline for current status on Kantara and all the DG/WG:

There is a new wiki page that will hold all the known implementations of Consent Receipts - Please update the page or inform Andrew of your implementation.

Planning a Member Plenary meeting October 26-ish San Francisco (Friday after IIW)

  • Are there specific cross-group items you'd like to propose to work on?
40 minInteroperable Consent Receipt demo at MyData ConferenceAndrew

Andrew walked through the sequence diagram.

  • Richard - the 'Export' consent receipt might be too disruptive to the user - maybe
  • John Krogulski - what data formats? A: It's set out in the specification
  • Mark - should we be using JWT for transfers?
    • A: This might be a complexity that we should incorporate in later interops
    • A: This is a complexity versus future-proofing question... ANDREW to ask the list/implementers
  • ACTION: All to post comments to the wiki page about the sequence diagram, questions, clarifications etc.
  • Storyboard
    • Ready to draft a user story - aiming for delivery on next call
  • Tom - there are prior activities that are not showing on the sequence - the Data Subject has to be identified to the Controller and Platform including any consents
  • Mark - the "initial consent flow" - the sequence is not showing the bootstrapping sequence - the sequence is showing the ongoing interactions
    • ACTION: Andrew to annotate with prerequistes and assumptions of user already being set up
  • Richard
    • ACTION: to document the technical flows of Consentua in the context of the interop demo sequence
  • Sylvester's Action item:

Receipt Reader

 A receipt reader is an application that parses (reads) consent receipts automatically. A reader only handles consent receipts in it's machine readable format  and is a component of some automatic process. 

Receipt Viewer

A receipt viewer is an application that a human uses to interpret the contents of a consent receipt. An application can only be considered a receipt viewer if it presents receipt data in a human readable form.

Receipt Dashboard

A receipt dashboard is an app used by humans to store and manage consent receipts. A user can use their dashboard to perform batch operations on multiple receipts at a time.

  ACTION: All to comment on these starter definitions, on list (note that the text above has already been edited)


AOB


Next meeting

2018-07-12 same time, same number

GOAL IS TO HAVE ALL DEMO PARTICIPANTS JOIN THE CALL TO WORK OUT ANY MAJOR ISSUES

 

From 2018-06-28

  • Discussed Kartik's v1 of the sequence diagram
  • Park: the discussion about 'viewer/reader/dashboard' and the differences in functionality that those terms encompass
  • Has anyone played with the 'sand' demo app? URLs to follow by email
  • First part of the demo:
    • Data Subject interacts with Organization A and as a result, a consent receipt is created and shown to the Data Subject. The consent receipt is stored in a place that is known to the Data Subject.
  • Second part of the demo:
    • Data Subject starts their preferred app which they normally use to view and manage their consent receipts and sees a list of consent receipts that are in the place referenced from the first part of the demo. Data Subject clicks the new consent receipt and the contents are displayed.
  • ACTION: Mark/Sylvester to write functional descriptions of the 'viewer/reader/dashboard' concepts

...