Page Comparison

...

• Mark proposes that privacy law and principle all have the common same requirements or explicit consent.  And that the provision of a consent receipt itself with valid contact details is equivalent to partially compliant consent. for consent across all jurisdictions. Is this equivalent to implied consent?    (brings up questions in the issue on github like: does implied consent also mean Express consent? if so does it require sharing and optional fields in the v0.8 spec ? )
• perhaps an implied consent receipt should be defined as the MVCR ?

...

• This depends oh what exactly constitutes the definition of explicit and implied consent for the MVCR.   (critical question for the MVCR)
  • is the receipt passive - in that if it is received and it is valid it achieves the MVCR explicit consent definition?
  • or does the receipt have to be active - in that if it is received and if the user clicks consent in the form,  the consent is receipt valid for explicit consent?
  I think we have a passive and active consent description
  • for
  the MVCR  perhaps this is the difference between implied and
  • explicit consent
  we want to proceed with
  • ?

Action Item Review 

• •  
    •  Mark Lizar - Update wiki with revised method for agenda creation -
    •  Mark Lizar work on timeline and roadmap for v1 - and present next week
    •  John WunderlichIain Henderson, Mary HodderMark Lizar  Homework - look at examples of previous specs - like Tim Berners - URI, the ICAL format, Email, etc as examlples of do's and don't for spec dev.  look at and discuss issues. .  (from respective  perspectives)
    •  John WunderlichIain Henderson Mary HodderMark Lizar --> proposal for offline discussion -   if someone needs more time on an agenda item, then that person can table this issue to the next meeting, (1 week) before being discuss on the agenda

...