...
1) Roll call for Quorum determination
8 7 members attending, 7 voting. quorum achieved.
2) Review and approve June 28 August 2 meeting draft minutes (June 28 attendees)
John Moves, Shin Fulup Seconds. Carried.
3) Post Implementation Review - What worked, what didn't - eGov Implementation Profile v2.0 of SAML 2.0 (allScoping the next work item: Template for eGov Deployment Profiles of SAML v2.0 (All)
Discussion: Vendors intending to conform to the profile need to be involved at the the outset in its creation, to reduce post publication queries and to understand the intent of the deployers that are calling for certain tests. Vendors seem to be focusing on test plan to get the certification and 'reverse engineering' to the profile. Potential issue regards IPR around non member vendors signing the Kantara GPA - would that force the work be done elsewhere?
4) Liaison Report:OASIS eGov Member Section (CW/BS)
The proposal to publish the IPV6 guidance received a negative comment. Launch of the -Gov-eGIF Analysis group on LinkedIn is getting good traction with discussion around developing a global centralised core set of standards that jurisdictions follow, rather than maintaining eGIF standards lists in silos. KI eGov members would be more than welcome to join.
5) Update: Await IOP WG release of eGov Implementation Profile Test Plan (JB)
Released onto the KI website today. http://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/display/certification/SAML+2.0+Full+Matrix+Test+Event
Discussion: Not all tests wanted by eGov can be implemented in Full Matrix (e.g. SHA RSA 256 Algorithm). 'Political' issues in standing up a single implementation as a benchmark for vendors. Some tests lack resources in terms of applications, kit and $. BS will be able to contribute Fed Canada's as a potential candidate sometime next month. It has 3 sections: the deployment vs eGov 2.0, Constraints on eGov 2.0, and CA-specific requirements. JB asks where trust establishment is. BS says via the use of signed certs and description.
4) Review Charter for further work items: IMI eGov Profile - yes or no? OpenID eGov Profile - yes or no? what else is needed? (All)
Discussion: US, CA and UK interested in IMI. US and JP interested in OpenID but waiting for Artifact binding on OpenD Connect. NZ needing an STS and asks for views on an eGOV STS profile. Protocol specific - OAuth, WSTrust etc. DK reminds the meeting of its OIO WSTrust profile and will resend to the list. Action: Thomas to send OIO WSTrust link to the list.
5) Agenda/dial in planning: Kantara F2F Paris 19-21 October.
Discussion: Attendees confirmed so far are John B, Fulup, Colin Sverre (tba). More expected. Colin has placed a strawman agenda based on proposed work items. Session times will allow for early morning call in from US West coast.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
6) LC and BoT updates (Incl. Assurance Review Board, Interop Review Board) (CW)
...
Discussion: Use the Implementation Profile's Table of Contents as a foundation. Begin progress on this from the next call (September 6).
8) Agenda/dial in planning: Kantara F2F Paris 19-21 OctoberLiaison Report:OASIS eGov Member Section (CW/BS) XXX
Discussion: Fulup, John and Colin are planning to attend. Sverre may also, depending on agenda. Action 2010-02-08-01: Colin to prepare draft agenda
...