Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • Is SAML the only protocol we need for moving identity attributes between parties?
    • If we need another one, say for provisioning and provisioning-like scenarios, is SCIM in the ballpark?
    • If so, would SAML & SCIM+ cover the waterfront?

CW: Protocol for moving... SAML (say, in moving around xACML atrributes) so JASON is more the SAML equivalent I think. SCIM is more a brand of a process in my view.  I think there is a workflow aspect we havent touched.. maybe xPDL? and wf-XML? 

  • What kinds of attribute metadata are required to fulfill identified requirements?
    • Will there be as many metadata schema as there are attribute schema, or does metadata's higher level of abstraction allow convergence on a (core) generic set of metadata elements?If

CW: In my view, metadata's higher level of abstraction will allow convergence on a (core) generic set of metadata elements?..you can have a 'core identity' metadata element with attributes of name, date of birth etc etc **

  •  If the domain of interest is attributes and associated metadata, is RDF a good logical model?

CW: Needs checking with developers but first guess is yes.

  • Is attribute exchange a first rung on an evolutionary ladder that reaches up to something like a distributed and federated event-driven model of application/service integration?