...
- Define the concept of attribute management context and demonstrate how essential it is to specify context in any multi-party discussion of attribute management
- Conduct an environmental survey of groups and activities in the attribute management space
- Establish formal liaison with the OASIS Trust elevation Technical Committee and the the OIX Attribute Exchange Working Group so that the various efforts are harmonised, synergistic and do not overlap
- Work with ISOC 'Internet Attribute Infrastructure' initiative and Business Cases for Trusted Federations (BCTF) DG to develop a commonly agreed roadmap to further develop attribute management and a set of guidance and best practice to assist implementers and deployers.
- Promote the development of catalogs or registries of specific sector attribute sets (i.e. extensions), lists of authoritative sources for attribute sets, protection and sharing of attributes (including privacy), and the metadata used to describe attributes
- Specifically, investigate options for establishing a registry for such information with reference to the requirements outlined in
- Initiate cross-party work on means of expressing relying party needs with respect to a level of confidence in an identity attribute, or a set of identity attributes. Define the components that constitute a 'LoC' for attributes and to confirm the need to differentiate this context from the context of identity proofing and credential strength that is applied to 'LoA' of identity
- Determine how attribute management Attribute Management Working Group findings can be brought back into the ongoing development of Kantara assessment framework developmentframeworks