...
(12) PROPOSERS: Names, email addresses, and any constituent affiliations of at least the minimum set of proposers required to support forming the WG. At least 3 proposers must be listed. At least 2 of the proposers must be Kantara Initiative Members - current members list
TBD
REFERENCES
Recommendations from the AMDG Final Report
- Define the concept of attribute management context and demonstrate how essential it is to specify context in any multi-party discussion of attribute management
- Conduct an environmental survey of groups and activities in the attribute management space
- Establish formal liaison with the OIX Attribute Exchange Working Group and the OASIS Trust elevation Technical Committee so that the various efforts are harmonised, synergistic and do not overlap
- Monitor developments in ISOC's 'Internet Attribute Infrastructure' initiative, the Business Cases for Trusted Federations (BCTF) DG, and look for opportunities to develop specific work streams within Kantara. Jointly develop a commonly agreed roadmap to further develop attribute management and a set of guidance and best practice to assist implementers and deployers.
- Initiate cross-party work on means of expressing relying party needs with respect to a level of confidence in an identity attribute, or a set of identity attributes. Define the components that constitute a 'LoC' for attributes and to confirm the need to differentiate this context from the context of identity proofing and credential strength that is applied to 'LoA' of identity