Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

...

Date

Jun 02, 2016

Attendees

  • Harri Honoko

    John Wunderlich

    Colin Wallis

    Eve Maler

    John Murphy 

    Mark Lizar

     

    Discussion 

    • Discuss Iains email on the list. 
      • that there should not be a machine readable consent receipt to begin with, but machine readable should come in at a second stage
    • John, said the original idea was  just the data dictionary 
    • Eve, suggested option C - we have it lets just call the notice a conformance level a JSON conformance level 
    • Harri - Say that we need to do the whole thing or it generates fragmentation - without machine readable it does not generate digital infrastructure.. 
    • put it all in the 
    • Colin Wallis - David Turner is waiting in the wings suggesting that we split the technical and the field discussions into two tracks

    Mary is Asking for a motion on way to move forward

    • Motion Made - By Eve
    • The spec should reflect conformance modes, including a level of technical conformance with JSON mark-up for interoperability, and also a data dictionary-only mode for conformance would include the wording or clauses alone.
    • Eve made the motions
      • John made ameddmendants
      • there were no objections
      • Mark Seconded. 
    • Discuss Meeting On Thursday instead of Monday 
      • Thursday call is agreed 7 am PT - 10 EST - 3pm GMT - 5pm EET
    • Discuss technical spec writer for the specification. 
    • Mark to take examples of v0.7.9 and put into v0.7.8 - spec, as well as start to turn into google doc then share with WG for 

    Action Items

  •