Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

With regard to attribute management and governance in Trust Frameworks, quite a bit of work has gone into the Identity Assurance aspect, with different levels of assurance certifications described by different standards bodies, auditors trained, and a general understanding of the concept shared. That said, finding a trust framework that extends down to the level of the attributes themselves is still a work in progress . An individual could have a mix of self-asserted and proofed attributes describing them, and a consumer of those attributes should be able to choose which attribute to use, depending on the context of the activity or transaction. The question of how a cohesive Trust Framework could handle information at the attribute level is still an open question and will be a critical component of attribute management.  The complexity of attribute management is multiplied many times in the case of inter-federation. Trust framework governance becomes a critical dependency for cohesive attribute management.

Efforts in this space:

The legal definition and implementation around consent is reaching a stable point in the EU. That said, there is still some concern that implementing consent in the federation space is still problematic. Consent management will undoubtedly involve consent-related attributes and attribute sets in the consent process.  Consent needs to be 'designed in' either as in band or as a service but implemented in a standardized way so you get consistent UX.

...

Recommendations

Attributes

A more detailed review of working groups, standards efforts, and general understanding of terms is required.

...

 The ideal document would be