...
TA: How about a question mark just to the left of the close box
PT: I like Trent's suggestion of a small question mark just to the left of the close box
Conclusion: We SHOULD include it and the text should include an explanation of at least the federation related aspects of logging in. I like Trent's suggestion of a small question mark just to the left of the close box
V4 eliminated the "show all" list
...
SC: I still think we do need the drop down list of everything. Two reasons (1) accessibility
BS: Yes, this IS needed for an accessibility perspective
JB: Yes, it must comply with ADA act, etc.
SC: The other motivation (2) is "context"--it gives some kinds of naive users some context. HOWEVER: it could move to a completely different presentation model (e.g. take over the screen on its own page (NOT on the popup))
TA: I though it was valuable that it illustrates the number of options. Perhaps there's a text link right next to that # of text that says "show all".
SC: perhaps need a heuristic on how to present.
TA: Yes, if there are a huge number, then it could become a hierarchy
BS: scroll bar (v.s. paging). This will not meet the Canadian accessibility guidelines and he THINKS it won't meet the W3C accessibility guidelines.
...
TA: I found this confusing
JB: Yes, I think people will find this confusing
TA: There is some value to letting you know. At the least some kind of confirmation "you signed in with Google last time, sign in again"
SC: If someone sits down and they are not malicious then
JB: Microsoft did some work on this. They ended up with "Click OK to continue logging in with XYZ" (not one click)
SC: From a confusion POV I'd think clicking on the Google thing is how you sign in.
SC: I would reverse them. The signin would do the drop down on the "Sign In"
TA: I would stop short of promoting the favicon in the bar. If you ask people "if you click this, what do you think this will do?" you'd get different answers.
SC: It looks better than what we had.
JB: Facebook proved that the last thing you want to do is surprise people.
SC: Yes, we've found that the deployers argue for fewer clicks, but actually they have more support.
PT: Hmm