Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Certification and Ratings: Certifications are about suitability to participate in trust framework, against a criteria that we develop, using a process that we define. We're certifying the infrastructure players. Parties being certified: assessors, signature authorities (signed a master IS agreement, provides an identity that allows a party to enter into a Data Transaction Agreement (DTA)), and rating services.

Ratings are 3rd party assessments about whether someone would want to do business with a company. Those assessments can use whatever criteria they deem appropriate.

What's relationship between signature authority (certified) and data recipient (not certified)? Signature needs to associate an identity and a legal entity, tools for identity/entity to sign DTAs. (similar to Verisign cert assertions) Data recipient: needs to sign one or more master agreements. Signature authority retains affirmation of that signature, provides tools for offering, accepting, signing DTAs (PKI keys?). Data recipients use tools for DTAs. Signing a master agreement (MA) needs to include agreement to honor DTAs, acceptance of default terms from master agreement. Signature authority registers and administers revocation process for identity/entity (registry of complaints) who are bad actors--signature authorities needs rights and responsibilities to revoke an identity from bad actors. (We're not designing process)

All a data recipient or individual needs to participate in framework is to have signed a MA that covers future DTAs and acceptance of default terms, evidence of signing. "This legal entity, as represented by these legal identifiers, has signed one or more MAs and have demonstrated their adherence to IS agreements (haven't yet been revoked)." Revocation process needs to have due process.

8. Action Items Review
  • Joe: draft proposal to write up engagement model template, present to leadership council, create template
  • Joe: follow up with John Bradley on budget
  • Joe: blog post: info sharing as enablement = civic engagement
  • Joe: creative brief for artwork
  • Joe: revise the ISWG introductory prezi, review with Iain on Friday
  • Joe: review Car Rental draft, send feedback to Rob.
  • Joe: PDEC start-up circle follow-up
  • Joe: follow up with Mary Ruddy re: vote at ID CommonsJudi: check with Joyce re: Phil & using Computer history Museum on Monday. If Joyce hasn't closed loop,
  • Joe will check with Phil. (Cafe is not open on Monday or Tuesday)Joe & Iain: call on Friday to advance presentation - tomorrow 9am PDT
  • Joe & Iain: brief bullet-points/updates to draft blog post for PDEC
  • Kaliya: mention on Start-up Circle mailing list about matching funds for Info Sharing Agreements
  • Judi: check with Joyce re: Phil & using Computer history Museum on Monday. If Joyce hasn't closed loop, Joe will check with Phil. (Cafe is not open on Monday or Tuesday)
  • Iain:

Next Meeting

TUESDAY 25 October 2011 - 90 minutes
Time: 9am HST | noon PST | 3pm EST | 9pm UK
Skype: +9900827042954214
US Dial-In: +1-201-793-9022
UK Dial-In: +44 (0) 8454018081
Room Code: 2954214

...