Transparency Performance Reporting (TPR) is a new type of novel approach to digital transparency ( and data control ) reporting, pioneered in by the same people and organisation group that specified Notice and Consent Receipts at the Kantara Initiative. Which is an amazing invention for decentralising This represents a significant advancement for decentralizing data governance, security, and privacy in within data flows.
The first initial Transparency Performance Report , is focused on determining if consent is valid, secure, sovereign and accountable. This follow up from the same people the focuses on evaluating the validity, security, sovereignty, and accountability of consent. This follows up on the consent receipt specification, for comment, Standard transparency over offering standard transparency regarding data sovereignty and the consent validity of consent with the use of in conjunction with digital identification systems.
“ Transparency “Transparency reporting , is a revolution in digital governance, while we have . While we've had the standad standard for a consent receipt since 2014, standard transparency over whether consent is valid is required to use consent for now essential for using consent in international data transfers. Transaprency Transparency reporting is required is crucial to scale meaningful consent, which means transparency reporting is not making it more than just another compliance tool. “,” says Mark Lizar, Editor of the ANCR v1v1. Transparency Performance Valid Consent Report. The ANCR TPR, just recently posted on Feb 14 for public review by the Kantara Initiative Community.
The ANCR transparency and consent work has quite the a 'bottom-up' history, originating as the Notice and Consent Receipt that was brought to Kantara in 2013 , by the by the Open Notice Initiative, and before that, the Identity Commons in California. The This initiative was launched aimed to created the standards required to address create standards addressing “the Biggest Lie on the Internet” Internet,” a campaign against terms and conditions in support of do no -not-track. Transparency Transparency performance reporting , makes it clear to everyone, clarifies when a notice and consent receipt is required.
The Notice and Consent Receipt v1 . specification as has been very successfulinfluential, as it was eventually being drafted in in conjunction with SOISO/IEC Online privacy notice and consent standard (29814). Known as the , also known as JTC 1, SC 27, WG WG 5 , that is – the international standards group focused on privacy and identity management. Through participation with the Kantara Initiative, this project which started originally Beginning at Identity Commons, made it all the way to the international commons. the project reached the international stage through the Kantara Initiative. The Notice and Consent receipt schema , itself has now itself become an ISOISO/IEC technical standard, currently called 27560 Consent recored record information structure.
The ANCR specification for Transparency Reporting introduce introduces four transparency performance indicators (TPI’sTPIs) that are used to assess if the validity of consent for digital identification management is valid. .
This TPR report, in development for 3 developed over three years in the ANCR workgroup is , represents a significant development step towards addressing big-tech surveillance and tracking, tracking, and promotes the glass-box Commonwealth security and privacy legal standards.
The timing of this announcement is significant, in as the expected 2025 , the ratification of the international Commonwealth treaty, Convention 108+, effectively creates will create the only global rules set for security and privacy, that is rights, law, and Commons-based. The only This foundation is suitable to for a common set of rules for allowing people to use, to hold services account accountable to international international (internet) standard standards for data governance.