Warning |
---|
This page is VERY MUCH in DRAFT. This set of metadata is for working purposes only and not authoritative. All LC members may update the page as they see appropriate. This page is for the purpose of LC planning for the future positioning of the WGs/DGs.Table cell colors are not indicative of a positive or negative assumption. Rather cell colors are as a means to visually see differences from cell to cell. |
...
Info | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
LC Approved on October 8, 2014. Presented to the Trustees on October 9th, 2014. |
Summary:
At a recent Board of Trustees (BoT) meeting, the Leadership Council (LC) recently raised discussion around WG and DG reporting structure in an effort to further engage the LC in the organizational planning and activities. The BoT recommended that the LC should engage all WG & DG leaders to determine if the structure of the organization may benefit from a review and refinement. The BoT also recognized that any possible merging of WGs & DGs will require a review of IPR and process to manage potential risks. Areas of impact to IPR are under the authority of the BoT. Thus the request for LC recommendation focuses toward a visualization of Kantara Initiative working structure rather than mechanics and process of merging WGs & DGs intellectual property.
Goal:
The goal of the LC WG/DG structure review is to produce a recommendation of reorganization to the BoT for consideration.
The LC recommendation may include approaches such as:
- Convergence and merging of one or more WGs & DGs
- Collection of specific WGs & DGs as "affiliated" under specific themes
- A combination of both convergence and affiliation approaches
- Another approach that is not listed above.
Themes:
The LC suggested the following two themes:
- Connected Life: focusing on access management, identities of things, consent and notice, and identity relationship management.
- Trust Services: focusing on scenarios that benefit from verification of services for both technology and policy deployment further enabling a trusted layer of interactions.
Key Consideration:
The LC made a specific note to advise that it suggests special consideration to IPR implications with regard to varying IPR under a particular theme. This could be related to any future desire to merge groups. A recommendation was made that it may be interesting to query new groups regarding the "firmness" of their initial IPR policy selection.
Table Header Key:
The table below captures current "metadata" associated with Kantara Initiative WGs & DGs.
- ACTIVE is noted by if the group is having conference calls, using their email list, producing output
- IPR is from the group charter
- PROGRAM notes if the group is connected to the Assurance or Interop programs developments
- INNOVATION notes if the group is working in a leading edge space where this work is not connected to a program
- SCOPE rough estimate of where the group focuses most between technology and policy (sometimes both)
- MEMBER OFFICER tied to developing discussions within the Board of Trustees seeking to understand if there is one Member officer in each group leadership.
CURRENT | STRUCTURE VIEWWORK GROUPS | ACTIVESTATUS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Work Groups | Active | IPR | PROGRAMProgram | INNOVATIONInnovation | SCOPETech | MEMBER OFFICER | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Attributes in Motion | N | CCSA | N | N | Tech & Policy | n/a | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Policy | Member Officer | Point of Contact | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cloud Identity and Security Best Practices | Y | RAND | N | Y | Policy | N | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
eGovernment | Y | CCSA | Y | N | Policy | Y | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federation Interoperability | Y | CCSA | Y | N | Tech | Y | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Health Identity Assurance | N | CCSA | Y | N | Policy | Y | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Identity Assurance | Y | RAND | Y | N | Policy | Y | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Identity Relationship Management | Y | CCSA | N | Y | Tech & Policy | Y | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consent and Information Sharing | Y | RAND | Y | Y | Tech & Policy | N | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Japan | N | CCSA | N | N | Regional | N | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trust Framework Meta Model | N | CCSA | N | Y | Policy | Y | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
User Managed Access | Y | RAND | Y | Y | Tech & Policy | Y | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DISCUSSION GROUPS | ACTIVE | IPR | PROGRAM | INNOVATION | SCOPE | MEMBER OFFICER | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Business Cases for Trusted Federation | N | CCSA | N | N | Use Case | Y | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Identities of Things | Y | CCSA | N | Y | Tech & Policy | Y | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
FORUM OR AFFILIATED VIEW - PROPOSED | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CONNECTED LIFE | ACTIVE | IPR | PROGRAM | INNOVATION | SCOPE | MEMBER OFFICER | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Identity Relationship Management | Y | CCSA | N | Y | Tech & Policy | Y | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Identities of Things | Y | CCSA | N | Y | Tech & Policy | Y | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
User Managed Access | Y | RAND | Y | Y | Tech & Policy | Y | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consent and Information Sharing | Y | RAND | Y | Y | Tech & Policy | N | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TRUSTED SERVICES | ACTIVE | IPR | PROGRAM | INNOVATION | SCOPE | MEMBER OFFICER | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Identity Assurance | Y | RAND | Y | N | Policy | Y | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
eGovernment | Y | CCSA | Y | N | Policy | Y | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federation Interoperability | Y | CCSA | Y | N | Tech | Y | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Health Identity Assurance | N | CCSA | Y | N | Policy | Y | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cloud Identity and Security Best Practices | Y | RAND | N | Y | Policy | N | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NOT SURE | ACTIVE | IPR | PROGRAM | INNOVATION | SCOPE | MEMBER OFFICER | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Business Cases for Trusted Federation | N | CCSA | N | N | Use Case | Y | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trust Framework Meta Model | N | CCSA | N | Y | Policy | Y | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Japan | N | CCSA | N | N | Regional | N
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Neil McEvoy (NO) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
eGovernment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Rainer Hoerbe (IC) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federation Interoperability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| John Bradley (PING) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Health Identity Assurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Pete Palmer (MedAllies) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Identity Assurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Rich Furr (Verizon) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Identity Relationship Management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Sal D'Agostino (IC) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consent and Information Sharing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Joe Andrieu (NO) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Japan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Yamada Tatsushi (NO) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trust Framework Meta Model |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Rainer Hoerbe (IC) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
User Managed Access |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Eve Maler (Forgerock) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discussion Groups | Active | IPR | Program | Innovation | Tech | Policy | Member Officer | Point of Contact | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Business Cases for Trusted Federation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Rainer Hoerbe (IC) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Identities of Things |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Ingo Friese (Deutche Telekom) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AFFILIATED GROUPS - PROPOSED | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Connected Life | Active | IPR | Program | Innovation | Tech | Policy | Member Officer | Point of Contact | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Identity Relationship Management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Sal D'Agostino (IC) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Identities of Things |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Ingo Friese (Deutche Telekom) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
User Managed Access |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Eve Maler (Forgerock) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consent and Information Sharing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Joe Andrieu (NO) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trust Services | Active | IPR | Program | Innovation | Tech | Policy | Member Officer | Point of Contact | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Identity Assurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Rich Furr (Verizon) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
eGovernment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Rainer Hoerbe (IC) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federation Interoperability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| John Bradley (PING) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Health Identity Assurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Pete Palmer (MedAllies) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cloud Identity and Security Best Practices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Neil McEvoy (NO) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Business Cases for Trusted Federation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Rainer Hoerbe (IC) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trust Framework Meta Model |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Rainer Hoerbe (IC) |