...
...
...
...
Date
2018-12-1320
Status of Minutes
DRAFTApproved
Approved at: <<Insert link to minutes showing approval>> 2019-12-12 Meeting notes (CR) DRAFT
Attendees
Voting
- Andrew Hughes
- Jim Pasquale
- Oscar SantolallaJohn Wunderlich
- Mark Lizar
- Paul Knowles
Non-Voting
- Robert Mitwicki
- David Turner
- Sal D'Agostino
- Sneha Ved
- Jan Lindquist
- Colin Wallis
Regrets
- Paul Knowles
- Mark Lizar
Quorum Status
Meeting was <<<>>> quorate
Voting participants
Participant Roster (2016) - Quorum is 6 of 11 as of 2018-11-19
Iain Henderson, Mary Hodder, Harri Honko, Mark Lizar, Jim Pasquale (C), John Wunderlich (VC), Andrew Hughes (VC), Oscar Santolalla, Richard Gomer, Paul Knowles, Samantha Zirkin
Discussion Items
Time | Item | Who | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
4 mins |
|
| |
5 min |
| All | Please review these blogs offline for current status on Kantara and all the DG/WG:
There is a wiki page that will hold all the known implementations of Consent Receipts - Please update the page or inform Andrew of your implementation.
|
30 10 min | Product roadmap for the demo | All | AOB
Proposed descriptionThe following is a very early draft description of the system we will demonstrate at EIC 2019 and other events. The main purposes of the Kantara Initiative In the Kantara vision, whenever an individual is asked for their personal data, or whenever their personal data is acquired, a ‘data processing receipt’ is created by the data controller. The receipt includes details about the conditions under which the data was obtained: the privacy notices provided; the lawful basis and purposes for collecting and processing data; the terms of the agreement and other metadata related to the interaction. These data processing receipts could be offered by the data controller’s system to the individual for storage in their personalOnce the data processing receipts are in the personal Decisions needed:
|
30 min | Specification update approach | All |
|
| |||
30 min | Specification update approach | All |
See a flowchart version of this here: https://share.mindmanager.com/#publish/b-DWOcuKGnVY1PXBKXTpL0-DQOeqmZMGfGUAPiC5 |
AOB | Paul - next SSI task is to build a 'consent schema' - 20 attributes so far - will circulate for review
Mark - liaison work
| ||
Next meeting | *** Next call 20182019-1201-20 10 10:30 am Eastern Standard Time / 15:30 GMT NO CALLS December 27 or January 3 |
From 2018-12-05 call:
...
- suggests showing of functionality of the 'privacy dashboard' concept
- suggests showing a communication flow between person, controller and a processor - showing how changes to preferences are communicated
- will show demo to Jim of consent receipt spec new features of digi.me - these probably will go in the next release
...
- 3-party consent will be implemented and tested in January
- will have an end-end demo at EIC
- showing how data sharing and consent management works (data subject, data controller, Sphere)
- would need to add an 'export' function
...
- Focus on the interoperability aspect
- 1) How do i combine multiple receipts into a single file? (zip, JSON format, etc) - to demo parsing packets of receipts - portability between dashboards
- 2) How to make a CR actionable - how to check it, revoke it, mutate it, is it valid in the service that issued it - this would allow dashboards to become 'control panels'
...
- Could use emulators to show mobile. Could also run and pause a video.
- Wants to speak about how CRs are used in their general aviation app - there are iPad/Android version
- Their data organization is information oriented, not privacy-first oriented
- The 'dashboard' feature for General Aviation might be the Passengers sharing their passport data to the Pilot for flight manifest compliance
...
- Power is in the 'proof' aspect of this - proof about what Notice was given
- For consent, Notice is required, followed by an Agreement
- Consentua has the concept of 'provenance' - all the elements that went into the agreement.
- Andrew suggested using the word 'agreement' instead of 'consent' - nobody agreed
- This is 'consent by design' that demonstrates the increased quality of consent.
- Idea: if there was a bare 'notice receipt' (a subset of the explicit consent receipt) that could be powerful to keep track of where notice was or was not provided correctly.
...
- From the person's perspective? (excercising data subject rights)
- From the data controller's perspective?
...
- One interface showing where the person shared their information for processing
- The person can interact and change their preferences related to these information processing interactions
- The control panel operates on a more complete capture of the provenance of the consent interaction
...
From earlier calls:
- Andrew has set up a github repo for next-version specification backlog items, including use cases:
https://github.com/KantaraInitiative/consent-receipt-v-next - Some possible items for next versions:
- Structural changes to the spec including a hierarchy of objects that should improve high transaction volume
- Integration/association of the new Blinding Identity Taxonomy into the CR Spec family (to inform implementers of potential data categories of interest)
- See also this Data Categories infographic: https://enterprivacy.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Categories-of-Personal-Information.pdf
- Recommendations for Customer Journey / UX / UI features
- Library of industry-specific or case-specific Purpose categories and example Purpose statements
- Expansion of Consent Types to allow for more than just Explicit Consent situations
- (idea) Optional receipt metadata to assist privacy dashboards in organizing and processing 'bring forward' items (e.g. "remind me to check this share in 3 months")
- digi.me product and management have identified six areas for development
- consent over period of time (rather than instantaneous consent)
- termination/modification of consent from either side
- high transaction volume & low per-instance cost
- how the 'receipt' fits into accounting systems infrastructures
- receipt as the basis for legal matters and actions
- UX/UI concerns
- for Clinical Trials uses, data holder is required to keep data for 10 years - need to consider longevity of the receipts to go alongside data holdings