Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Date

Attendees

See the Participant roster

Voting (3 of 6 required for quorum)

Participant

Attending

1

Chaudhury, Atef

2

Jones, Thomas

Tom’s AI

3

Krishnaraj, Venkat

4

Thoma, Andreas

5

Wunderlich, John

Yes

6

Williams, Christopher

Regrets

Non-Voting

Participant

Attending

1

Auld, Lorrayne

2

Aronson Mark

3

Balfanz, Dirk

4

Brudnicki, David

5

D'Agostino, Salvatore

6

Davis, Peter

7

Dowtin, Jazzmine

8

Dutta, Tim

9

Flanagan, Heather

10

Fleenor, Judith

11

Glasscock, Amy

12

Graaf, Irene

13

Gropper, Adrian

14

Hodges, Gail

15

Hughes, Andrew

Regrets

16

Jordaan, Loffie

Yes

17

LeVasseur, Lisa

18

Lopez, Cristina Timon

19

McBride, Adam

20

Pasquale, Jim

21

Snell, Oliver

22

Stowell, Therese

23

Sutor, Hannah

24

Tamanini, Greg

25

Vachino, Maria

26

Whysel, Noreen

Goals

  • Review process for requirement creation and review

Discussion items (AKA Agenda)

Item

Who

Notes

  • Start the meeting.

  • Call to order

  • Approve minutes

  • Approve agenda

John Wunderlich

Called to order: 14:05

Quorum reached: No

Minutes to approve: Approved

2024-11-06 Meeting notes - Draft

Open Tasks Review

All

Link to Recommendations (Commenter Link): Recommendations for Privacy Enhancing Mobile Credentials

Task report
spacesPEMCP
createddateFrom01-01-2024
isMissingRequiredParameterstrue

Comment Dispostion

John Wunderlich

Discussion

A number of comments have been received and disposed of (see link below). Nothing substantive and barring unforeseen circumstances, when the deadline is reached on the 23, we should be able to move forward on the LC approval and All Member BallotNew comments are arriving, some of which may be substantive. For example, these initial comments:

  1. "Holder Consent" appears to be absolutely required in pretty much all cases - this is not pragmatic and is probably a dark pattern

  2. Many of the requirements statements directly refer to "laws" and "regulations" - this is not a good idea -  adherence to the requirements is voluntary, and regardless, all entities shall abide by laws and regulations no matter what we say they should do. It weakens the requirement if we are forced to say stuff like "or is required by law" - we should try to find a way to say the requirement so that carve out is not necessary.

NOTE: Only Kantara Members can vote on approving report for publication. If you or your organisation are not Kantara members and want to vote, you will need to become Kantara members.

Disposition of Comments: PICPR20241010

Implementors and Implementors Guidelines

All

Looking for organisations to volunteer to implement the requirements and self certify. This is a valuble first step towards ensuring that the requirements are practicable and may lead to usefull revisions

Adjourn

Next meeting in two weeks

Next meeting

Action items

...