Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Quorum: As of 2019-12-19, quorum is 3 of 5. There was quorum


Agenda 

  1. Administration:
  • Roll Call
  • Agenda Confirmation
  • Action Item Review: action item list
  • Minutes approval:

...

2. Discussion

3. Any Other Business 


Minutes Approval 

...

Comments on PCTF Organization Component 

  • Ken has walked the group through each of the initial

...

...

  • It was commented that it's critical that when we are doing business,

...

  • the organization we are making a transaction with be a verified

...

  • organization. The main goal is to have process in place to ensure that federation networks are accountable and reliable and that exists and can be collected. 

-Enabling business to go to a validation process.

-Ask for a use model/case.

-electronic signature

Line 99 Add a termination/dissolution function. List all the things that

Authorized agent = CSP

...

  • Ken said that on the Privacy related ones, they must identify a valid reason for collecting information and get the proper consent. Richard asked if it's exclusively for the purposes of identity proofing. Ken confirmed yes. Richard stated that 63-3 provision on that says that we only should collect only information to uniquely establish the identity. 
  • Martin asked what aspect DUNS does not cover. Richard added that it's not a guaranteed source. Martin clarified it's a British entity. Ken will investigate about DUNS Registry. 
  • The participants agreed with the comments and asked Ken to submit them to  DIACC. 
  • Ken

...

  • asked if some of these PTCF criteria can be included in the Kantara IAF.

...

  • Richard,

...

  • answered affirmative but he suggested to wait for DIACC to refine the text and then explore its adoption.
  • Ken pointed out that PCTF could be another KI class of approval. Richard added that we could extend the range of criteria in the CO-SAC, which will affect Classic and 800-63 rev.3, but it won't solve the Canadian requirements. Therefore, Richard supports Ken's suggestion that the better path would be to create a new class of approval with the Canadian full set of criteria