Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

Date

Apr 06, 2016

Attendees

RepresentationNameAttended
Connected Life Innovation Groups
IRMWGSalvatore D'Agostino 
UMAWGEve MalerYes
CISWGFormer user (Deleted)Yes
CISWGMark Lizar (Unlicensed)Yes
IoTDGFormer user (Deleted) 
Trust Services Interoperability Groups
IAWGKen Dagg (Unlicensed)Yes
IAWGFormer user (Deleted)Yes
HIAWGFormer user (Deleted)Yes
eGovWGColin Wallis (Unlicensed)Yes
FIWGJohn Bradley 
CISBPDGFormer user (Deleted) 
Staff
KantaraColin Wallis (Unlicensed)Yes
VirtualFormer user (Deleted)Yes

Agenda

  1. Roll Call
  2. Approve Minutes
    1.  2016-03-23 Meeting Minutes
  3. Administration
    1. Executive Director / Staff Update
    2. Tools - Working Drafts - please see the tools spreadsheet here.
    3. Voting
      1. IAWG has approved IAF-1401 (Meeting Minutes) and submits to LC for endorsement vote. IAF-1401 is a spreadsheet version of the IAF-1400 Service Assessment Criteria v4.0. It is non-normative and should be considered guidance for users of the IAF. The report is attached to this page.
  4. Operationalizing the Kantara Theme and Collaboration
    1. Discussion on 'innovation' ideas for DGs?
  5. Update on Group IP Analysis Project
    1. Status update on Covenant-style agreement?
    2. Background: Trust Services and Connected Life by IPR on spreadsheet (please find this document here: Working Drafts)
  6. WG Project Status Updates
    1. UMA Dev Project
    2. CIS Project
    3. IAWG Project
  7. WG Updates 
    1. Quarterly Reports - discussion on process
    2. All
  8. Events
    1. LC Members support for Events
      1. EIC 2016 Munich (Kantara workshop) - confirmed – May 10 - 13, 2016
      2. CIS 2016 New Orleans - confirmed – June 6- 9, 2016
  9. BoD Liaison Report & Action Requests
  10. Other Action Items Review: see below
  11. AOB
    1. [KI-LC] Call to Action: Invitation to Review MVCR Draft v0.8 Spec - Mark Lizar
    2. [KI-LC] Looking for Spec and Implementation guidance writing/polishing for MVCR - Colin Wallis
  12. Meeting adjournment

Discussion Items

TimeItemWhoNotes
4:05pmRoll CallAndrew Hughes

 

 Approve MinutesAndrew HughesEve Maler made a motion to approve the March 23, 2016 minutes as presented. The motion was seconded by Mark Lizar. There were no objections. The motion passed.
 

Administration

  • Executive Director / Staff Update
  • Voting
 

Executive Director/Staff Update

  • Colin Wallis noted that since the last call things are looking up with the first transfer of money from ISTO being completed this week.
  • Colin reported that the Virtual PR team is working with Kantara on the upcoming events. Kantara may be sponsoring an event that will provide Kantara with awareness opportunities.
  • New members ramping up - more details to come on the next call.
  • CCICADA program going well; lots of working groups participating.
  • Potential liaison opportunity with FIDO Alliance (Confidential) other consortia/organizations being discussed.
  • Off-cycle informal Board meeting tomorrow, all are invited.
  • There will be a face-to-face Board meeting in Munich on Monday, May 9 followed by Kantara's workshop on Tuesday, May 10.

Voting

  • IAWG has approved IAF-1401 (Meeting Minutes) and submits to LC for endorsement vote. IAF-1401 is a spreadsheet version of the IAF-1400 Service Assessment Criteria v4.0. It is non-normative and should be considered guidance for users of the IAF. The report is attached to this page.
  • Upon the LC vote the document can be published as a report on the Kantara website.
  • A motion was made by Ken Dagg to move forward with publishing IAF-1401, motion seconded by Pete Palmer. There being no objections the motion carried.
  • Action Item: Ken Dagg to coordinate the publication of the report.
 Operationalizing the Kantara Theme and Collaboration 

Discussion on 'innovation' ideas for DGs

RP DG: most interesting is setting Thinking about gathering a set of requirements that GSPs Relying Parties need CSPs to meet. Actual service assessment criteria they need to meet have been designed by audtiors and TSPs without regard for what the requiring parties wantCurrent Service Assessment Criteria are designed from the point of view of audtiors and CSPs. The area of requirements is has been of interest since the to Gov't of Canada since they became involved in Kantara. Idea is to start a RP Discussion Group to discuss the requirements. Some of the work already done by eGov would help kick start the discussion. The rollout of the EMV might be an opportunity to leverage the discussion. Another potential entry point would be trust frameworks. Possibly invite CSP’s customers to the groups; create a membership campaign with aggressive tactics. In the style of "member-get-a-member" campaigns.

HIA WG: the WG will be focusing on the patient identity ecosystem. Focusing on discovery and directories. 200 patients a day die from misidentification, that's a "flight a day".

IDM Professional Association: is it time for Kantara to create this association? Build a body of practice knowledge for practitioners. It is likely this association will start, should it be Kantara?

Trust Services in EU: Starting to look at Trust Frameworks Interoperability; an area to keep an eye on. Will consent receipts add value to Trust Services? How would this transition through a conformance program?

 

Update on Group IP Analysis Project

 

Status update on Covenant-style agreement

  • Background: Trust Services and Connected Life by IPR on spreadsheet (please find this document here: Working Drafts)
  • Per Colin Wallis there is no further progress to report on right now.
 WG Project Status Updates 

UMA Dev Project

Eve reported that the group is working on the CCICADA white paper proposal. She isn't sure that the UMA Dev WG has formally requested funds from Kantara at this point. An outline is complete with a rough draft being fleshed out over the month of April. It was suggested that Mark may be able to share his white paper and feedback with Eve.

CIS Project

Mark reported that CISWG placed funding requests for Real Consent & Consent Receipt; awaiting funds. He also reported that the CCICADA project received feedback today. The MVCR was not well explained, needs more.

Regarding the funding, Mark noted that the WG doesn't have the resources to do what they are trying to do, will need to make a decision to work on one profile for a Consent Receipt or work on a larger specification for a Consent Receipt.

IAWG Project

Ken reported that the group is developing a Statement of Requirements for professional resources. If approved by the IAWG this will be routed through the Leadership Council first for approval prior to the Board's review/approval.

UMA Legal Project

Eve noted that the UMA Legal project is the development of model definitions and model clauses to accelerate prep frameworks. UMA was asking for funding to help an "IDE" to assemble or create the clauses or clauses that exist. Ken noted that this funding has been approved.

Eve also noted that this ties into a conference event that UMA is involved called Digital Contracts, Identities and Blockchain at MIT on May 23-24, 2016. Hardjono, Hazard, Maler are leading the event. The event is invite only, however, if registrations don't reach the max Eve will supply the details. This may be an event for Kantara to "sponsor". Eve will send the details to Colin and Andrew.

 WG Updates  

Andrew noted that we are continuing with the bullet point updates on the LC wiki. These brief points can be posted by yourself or send them to Andrew for posting.

UMAWG

  • Eve reported that UMAWG has a 2016 roadmap which is exciting, maybe disruptive. Shows that this is a vibrant technical space. 
  • She noted that the Conformance program discussion is alive. And Roland Hedberg, on behalf of HEART, is implementing a test suite for UMA (security profile).

CISWG

  • Mark reported that they are getting ready for IIW. The group is under-resourced right now for some of their ambitions of the NBCR MVCR (Minimum Viable Consent Receipt) spec. The goal is to have a push and call to action for the conformance profile which can be used for the test use case (online consent).
  • A big driver is the User Submitted Terms and what is happening with Customer Commons at IIW. The group is interested in a couple of use cases.
  • Mary noted that there are a number of folks in the group with entities who would like to do pilots which would be significant.
  • Mary is now the active Chair for this quarter.
  • Lots of EU interest for MVCR for GDPR.

HIAWG

  • Ken reported that Hannah from CERN is presenting to IAWG tomorrow.

eGov

  • Colin reported that the eGov activity is currently focused on elections and the code of conduct for Relying Parties.
  • David Kelts (MorphoTrust) has joined the group.
  • InCommon plans to contribute their Interop profile.
  • eGov did the deployment profile several years ago; the idea is to bring the eGov elements into the InCommon profile.
 Events 

Great to have members involved in upcoming events.

EIC 2016 Munich (Kantara workshop) - confirmed – May 10 - 13, 2016

CIS 2016 New Orleans - confirmed – June 6- 9, 2016

 

BoD Liaison Report & Action Requests

 There hasn't been a Board meeting since the last report out.
 AOB 

Andrew noted that there were two calls for help on the MVCR. Reviewers and editing needed to finish the specification. Colin agreed that this would be good to bring up at the informal Board meeting tomorrow.

[KI-LC] Call to Action: Invitation to Review MVCR Draft v0.8 Spec - Mark Lizar

[KI-LC] Looking for Spec and Implementation guidance writing/polishing for MVCR - Colin Wallis

 Other Action Items Review 

Andrew noted that an action log has been established on the LC space to better track the actions.

See the action log for the current list of actions/status.