Attendees
Mark
Andrew
Richard W.
Nathan
Scott
Key discussion items
- It was discussed what we are trying to produce in the sub-group.
- Andrew shared a straw man on 63B (Section 5.1.7) and asked the group if this was the right direction of the work.
Kantara Initiative Mail - [SG-800-63-3] Sample analysis of 63-3B requirements.pdf
5.1.7 analysis ACH.docx - There was a general consensus that the straw man was not what the group is trying to achieve and produce.
- It was commented that the outcome of the group, should enable an assessor to assess that a CSP meets 800-63-3.
...
- Scott highlighted that we should focus on a criteria clearly identified list of what are the sets of requirements, get them all clearly articulated so that can be evaluated or assessed. We need to use whatever a structure to there is to formally express the content that can be evaluated in a rigorous way.
63-3 specific we are going 62-3 OP SAC as the ongoing international -3 approval process
- Richard W. commented that the current IAF SAC is beyond 800-63-2 in order to provide a more international approach.
- In this sense, it was said that we should focus on 63-3
...
- beyond just
...
- FICAM circle.
...
Should not
...
-
- Scott reminded the group that in this phase we need to identify and document the requirements.
Action items
- Mark to document and create a directed graph with optional and required edges on it that describes the
...
- spec (with JSON-LD)
...
- Andrew Hughes
...
- to break down
...
- 63B
...
- Scott
...
- to break down 63C
...
...
AUDIO/VIDEO FILE
...
| Widget Connector | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|