Attendees
Mark
Andrew
Richard W.
Nathan
Scott
Key discussion items
- It was discussed what we are trying to produce in the sub-group.
- Andrew shared a straw man on 63B (Section 5.1.7) and asked the group if this was the right direction of the work.
Kantara Initiative Mail - [SG-800-63-3] Sample analysis of 63-3B requirements.pdf
5.1.7 analysis ACH.docx - There was a general consensus that the straw man was not what the group is trying to achieve and produce.
- It was commented that the outcome of the group, should enable an assessor to assess that a CSP meets 800-63-3.
...
- Scott highlighted that we should focus on criteria clearly identified list of what are the sets of requirements, get them all clearly articulated so that can be evaluated or assessed. We need to use a structure to formally express the content that can be evaluated in a rigorous way.
- Richard W. commented that the current IAF SAC is beyond 800-63-2 in order to provide a more international approach.
- In this sense, it was said that we should focus on 63-3 beyond just FICAM circle.
- Scott reminded the group that in this phase we need to identify and document the requirements.
Action items
- Mark to document and create a directed graph with optional and required edges on it that describes the spec (with JSON-LD)
- Andrew Hughes to break down 63B
- Scott Shorter to break down 63C
...
AUDIO/VIDEO FILE
...
| Widget Connector | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|