Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Migrated to Confluence 4.0

...

  1. The host received metadata of the AM like OAuth 2.0 endpoints
  2. The host received an OAuth access token in order to verify requester access tokens in step 3 and as a representation of the user's decision to
  3. The AM recoived received a list of protected resources on the host it is supposed to authorize on behalf of the user.

The following sub steps are performed in order to fulfill these requirements:

  1. The host looks up the authorization manager metadata and learns about API endpoints and formats supported by the AM
  2. The host obtains OAuth client credentials and a the location of the resource registration API from the authorization manager.
  3. The host obtains an access token from the authorization manager by following the OAuth 2.0 web server flow.
  4. The host registers the authorization user's resources with the AM by using the resource registration API.
Note
titleTODOs/Issues
  • Host and AM can both decide if they work with the other side
  • AM can refuse client id/secret. Needs error conditions
  • How can the Host trust the AM? There are trust frameworks around for that these days
  • no big difference between RRAPI to be in hostmeta or provisioned in step 2. Needs more input to get decision
  • step 2 might be a separate specification.
  • maybe in this specification the server can put in additional data specific to some namespace. Example:
    Code Block
    
        { 'client_id' : '72z81uhbjhssd867e',
          'client_secret' : 'test123',
          'expires_in' : 3600,
          'http://uma/am/resource_registration_uri' : 'http://....',
      
  • format of RRAPI (resource registration API) still open. Needs to get discussed with step 2.
  • maybe not all resources are listed (every tweet?) but maybe "tagged 'important'", "folder x" etc. How are they identified? Maybe about scopes/uri parameters?
  • should the host be able to define claims upfront?

host looks up the authorization manager metadata

...

Rel

Cardinality

HTTP Method(s)

Description

http://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/display/uma/req_user_uri

Required

As defined by OAuth

Supplies the OAuth user_uri endpoint requesters should use to gather the consent of the authorizing user for user delegation flows in synchronous person-to-service sharing scenarios.

http://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/display/uma/req_token_uri

Required

As defined by OAuth

Supplies the OAuth token_uri endpoint requesters should use to ask for an access token in Step 2.

...

Example XRD document

Code Block
xml
xml

<!-- Applies to both hosts and requesters -->
<Property 
    type="http://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/display/uma/token_formats"
>saml<
>
       saml
</Property>
<Property 
    type="http://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/display/uma/claim_formats"
>json<
>
       json
</Property>

<!-- Host "authorization API" -->
<Link rel="http://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/display/uma/host_token_uri"
      href="https://am.example.com/host/token_uri"></Link>
<Link rel="http://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/display/uma/host_user_uri"
      href="https://am.example.com/host/user_uri"></Link>
<Link rel="http://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/display/uma/host_token_validation_uri"
      href="https://am.example.com/host/token_validation_uri"></Link>

<!-- Requester token-getting endpoints -->
<Link rel="http://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/display/uma/req_token_uri"
      href="https://am.example.com/requester/token_uri"></Link>
<Link rel="http://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/display/uma/req_user_uri"
      href="https://am.example.com/requester/user_uri"></Link>

Host obtains authorizing user's consent to trust AM for access decisions

The host gets a host access token from the AM that represents the approval of the authorizing user for the host to trust this AM for protecting the resources it manages for this user.

NOTE: The host is free to offer the option to protect any subset of the user's resources using different AMs or other means entirely; any such partitioning is outside the scope of this specification.

The host MUST use the [OAuth20] web server flow (@@TBS: subsequently profile it to use UMA recursively for claims-getting purposes?), utilizing the host_user_uri and host_token_uri endpoints. The host acts in the role of an OAuth client; the authorizing user acts in the role of an OAuth end-user resource owner; and the AM acts in the role of an OAuth authorization server.

If the host has not already received client credentials from the AM prior to entering the web server flow, it MUST wield the client_id "uma_host_anonymous_client" and no client_secret (@@TBS: Explain how to do dynamic association to get unique client credentials).

Host supplies resource details to AM

...

The host obtains OAuth client credentials and the location of the resource registration API from the authorization manager

In order for the host to initiate an OAuth flow to retrieve an access token for the resource registration API and the token verification API, it needs to have a client identifier and optionally a client secret. How this is transferred is beyond the scope of the OAuth specification and usually a manual process of preregistration and transferring this information is used.

In this step the host is the OAuth client and the authorization manager is the OAuth authorization server. For User Managed access the authorization server MUST provide the client identifier, an OPTIONAL client secret and the URI of the resource registration API which can be individual for each client.

Note

Should we really use a different name for the AM vs. AS? It can be confusing as we see here.

In order to also allow for dynamic binding of a host and authorization manager, this specification also defines a protocol for dynamic and automatic client registration for OAuth.

Dynamic binding of OAuth clients

Note

It probably really should be a separate specification

Terminology

Dynamic binding will be explained in OAuth terminology, using client and authorization server as the parties involved in the process.

Moreover the following terminology is used:

client registration endpoint: This is the URI defining the location of the client registration API. This is used by the client to send the required data for obtaining a client identifier and additional information

Discovery of client registration endpoint

In order for the client to obtain the URI of the client registration endpoint the authorization server MUST provide a hostmeta document containing a Link element with rel-value http://kantarainitiative.org/uma/client_registration_uri.

Overview

The dynamic client registration process works as follows:

  1. The client send it's name and description as well as an optional image to the client registration endpoint
  2. the authorization server checks the data and returns a JSON formatted document containing a client identifier, optional client secret and optionally additional information

The client registration flow

The client sends a client descriptor to the authorization server

The client creates a JSON document with the following keys/value pairs:

  • the name of the client in the key name
  • the URL to the service in the key name
  • a short description of the client in the key description
  • OPTIONAL: the URI to an icon representing the client in the key icon
Note

probably we need more information but most of it should be optional to increase interoperability

An example client descriptor might look like follows:

Code Block

{
    name : 'A wonderful image hoster',
    url: 'http://wonderfulimagehoster.com',
    description : 'as the name implies',
    icon: 'http://wonderfulimagehoster.com/logo.png'
}

The client then performs a POST request to the client registration endpoint using application/json as content type and sending the client descriptor in the body of the message.

The authorization server sends a response containing the client credentials

The authorization server can check the client descriptor as it requires and will then send either a success or an error response.

The success response is a JSON document consisting of a REQUIRED client identifier in the field client_id and an optional matching secret in the field client_secret.

An example response might look like this:

Code Block

{
    client_id : 'AGSD)=bjchdb