(all in one file)
=== 30 Mar 2022===
- attendants: vitor jesus (Unlicensed) Tadej Fius (Unlicensed) Salvatore D'Agostino (Unlicensed) Crt Ahlin jim pasquale Former user (Deleted)
- calls will take a break until (expected) mid/end of May to progress offline work
- core spec
- software proof of concept
=== 17 Mar 2022===
- attendants: vitor jesus (Unlicensed) Tadej Fius (Unlicensed) Salvatore D'Agostino (Unlicensed)
- apologies: Crt Ahlin Jan Lindquist (Unlicensed) jim pasquale
- architecture of the proof-of-concept as a web3 application
=== 10 Mar 2022===
meeting postponed, due to lack of availability of members.
===3 Mar 2022===
- attendants: vitor jesus (Unlicensed), jim pasquale Salvatore D'Agostino (Unlicensed)
- apologies: Jan Lindquist (Unlicensed) Crt Ahlin Tadej Fius (Unlicensed)
- google doc has now some content: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1McwATIvRBBO7GJruWT5PmbHO1QKEjn9tYyP3GOI0NM0/edit#
- WG/project housekeeping
- CRWeb receipt as an extension of PDUR?
- demo of a browser extension abel to detect a receipt opportunity, web semantics (JSON-LD) and generate + display a user receipt
===24 Feb 2022===
- attendants: vitor jesus (Unlicensed), Salvatore D'Agostino (Unlicensed) , Jan Lindquist (Unlicensed)
- apologies: jim pasquale
- google doc leading to the spec at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1McwATIvRBBO7GJruWT5PmbHO1QKEjn9tYyP3GOI0NM0/edit#
- allocation of tasks on the doc
- discussion on terminology and workflows/lifecycles
===17 Feb 2022===
- attendants: vitor jesus (Unlicensed), Jan Lindquist (Unlicensed), Salvatore D'Agostino (Unlicensed), Jeff Corrigan. Tadej Fius (Unlicensed)
- apologies:
- welcoming Jeff Corrigan and pointing out formalities
- there's now a working json of the receipt structure
- current list of fields (xls)
- notion that a next gen receipt needs two components:
- bidirectionality, so a protocol user/controller can be devleoped (e.g., signing)
- hooks to external services (e.g., obtaining keys, identities, risk rating)
- open sourcing code is supported by all
- Jeff suggests posting code + docs under AWS but not locked to AWS (as a reference implementation and forkable) - similar to this.
- forward: procude some text in the spec --> code --> finish spec
- list of fields
- dev team will do code outside the regular calls and report back
Actions:
- create spec structure in gdocs
- setup meeting with devs
===10 Feb 2022===
- attendants: Jan Lindquist (Unlicensed) Črt Ahlin, Salvatore D'Agostino (Unlicensed) jim pasquale
- apologies: vitor jesus (Unlicensed) Former user (Deleted) Former user (Deleted) Former user (Deleted)
Agenda
1) intros
2) review active deliverables
AP: create a document that can be used for a hackathon for the next meeting
https://www.wearemillions.online
4. Receipt format (Vitor)
5. Event handling (Tadej)
6. Security (Tadej)
- Use Case (Črt)
3) demo preparation
4) other topics of interest
Notes ahead of the meeting
- a new file with fields with an added column about
- where each field is sourced from
- whether it is independently obtained by the user (or browser user-agent) such as "on Behalf of PII Principal", "keys")
- whether it comes directly from the Controller via JSON in the HTNL (that the add-on detects)
- whether it is mutually agreed using a protocol (complexity of it to be discussed) - e.g., the Privacy Notice hash needs to be sent by the Controller bu verified by the User - both do hashes and confirm they match)
- whether the information could/must come from a third-party (a directory, registry, blockchain, etc)
- where each field is sourced from
===3 Feb 2022===
- attendants: vitor jesus (Unlicensed), Jan Lindquist (Unlicensed), Črt Ahlin, Salvatore D'Agostino (Unlicensed)
- apologies: Former user (Deleted), jim pasquale, Former user (Deleted)
- The call was moved to a different time (2pm/GMT, 9am/ET) which caused agenda conflicts
- Brief catch-up on the work
===27 Jan2022===
call did not happen due to agenda conflicts
===20 Jan2022===
- attendants: vitor jesus (Unlicensed) , Former user (Deleted) , Črt Ahlin, tadej.fius@datafund.io,jim pasquale,Salvatore D'Agostino (Unlicensed), Tadej Fius (Unlicensed)
- apologies: Jan Lindquist (Unlicensed)
- continue the overview of 1st draft receipts field (link TBA)
- reviewed and scoped with group comments CRWeb receipt format (13jan22 version - crweb-receipt-format-20220113.xlsx)
- vitor jesus Tadej Fius (Unlicensed) to create a template JSON first iteration of the current iteration of the receipt spec (still working on itWorking on a demo, and a external potential hackathon for early Marchdata model → the data model will raise missing details and specifics (e.g., what is excatly a "key")
- IIW will be the end of April (show whatever we'd like) This session will be in-person what to present?
- How does the lifecycle get addressed (Vitor will elaborate in the roadmap) Lifecycle manager not part of the receipt
- the record or receipt should only include key information per the kind of consent as an extension of CR 1.1
- @Črt There will also be work done on registries as part of Fair Data Protocol; juyst FYI at this point, but at one stage I see the structure of the receipt "registered" in this way: https://github.com/fairDataSociety/FIPs/blob/master/text/0001-fdp-roadmap.md
- rough roadmap for the essentials of the spec:
- Working prototype (in the sense of "Minimum Viable Concept/Product") by mid Feb. This is a website, add-on, html semantics, receipt record
- This work to feed ideas (by end of Feb) and a potential participation in https://www.wearemillions.online (1-21 March)
- from here we develop the more advanced concepts such as lifecycle etc
===13 Jan2022===
- attendants: vitor jesus (Unlicensed) , Salvatore D'Agostino (Unlicensed) , Former user (Deleted) , Črt Ahlin, jim pasquale
...