Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Date

2017-10-05

Status of Minutes

DRAFTApproved

Approved at: <<Insert link to minutes showing approval>> 2019-12-12 Meeting notes (CR) DRAFT

Attendees

Voting

  • Mark Lizar
  • Iain Henderson

...

Iain Henderson, Mary Hodder, Harri Honko, MarkLizar, Jim Pasquale, John Wunderlich, Andrew Hughes, Rupert Graves

Discussion Items

Time

Item

Who

Notes

Time

Item

Who

Notes

4 mins
  • Roll call
  • Agenda bashing
  •  
1 min
  • Organization updates
All

Please review these blogs offline for current status on Kantara and all the DG/WG:

  • Update on the new WG title being proposed as Privacy for Public Policy
  • Discusse that the current IPR - RF RAND does not allow for derivative works
  • Discussed with Iain that the new GDPR for customers might be better placed under the non-assert covenant
  • Action - Iain to send an email to principle in this work and see if the new WG IPR be placed under this new wg for customer commons and Kantara
5 30 minDiscuss 'sprint' process diagramDavid

 What is left to do for v1.1?

David to produce a new update of the document after this call

  • 3 issues
    • security considerations
      • Tom brings up confirmation of the receipt of the receipt out of scope but could/should be mentioned
      • Is the receipt is PII?
        • Tom mentions a Latanya Sweeney PII identifiably study - needs trusted 3rd party
      • This boils down to wether or not encryption is required and at which level
      • we decide to err on the side of caution and put in a MUST.
    • examples for list of collection methods
    • combining the on-behalf -
      • clarify use of third party field name
        • which party is on the front of the data collection process and which party is on the behalf
        • reconciling on behalf with the 3rd party
        • example
          • SAAS service in the cloud
            • SAAS is the data controller
            • hosted storage wold be the PII processor
          • Is this being shared with related parties on non-related parties
      • David suggests
        • we keep it as is, and to keep this as an item to be dealt with in the next iteration of the receipt
        • in addition, disclosure to process or 3rd party is deal with in the next generation of the
  • Disclosure to another jurisdiction -
10
  • as a remaining field need for the CR v1.1

1

min

Discuss work backlog priorities for CR v1.1David

Github Issues: https://github.com/KantaraInitiative/CISWG/issues

30 minDraft of publication synopsis for new WGAndrew





Discussion


  •   
  •   
  •