Page Properties |
---|
id | meeting-status-metadata |
---|
|
|
Info |
---|
The meeting status metadata table is used for summary reports - copy the status macros from the table in these instructions: Quorum: Status |
---|
colour | Yellow |
---|
title | not quorate |
---|
|
Notes-Status: Status |
---|
colour | Blue |
---|
title | Ready for review |
---|
|
Approved-Link: Insert a link to the Meeting Notes page holding the approval decision for this notes page |
Agenda
Call meeting to order
Roll call & determination of voting participant quorum
Approval of previous minutes
Announcements
Main discussion items (see table below)
AOB
Adjourn meeting
\uD83D\uDC65 Attendees
Voting - Michael Magrath, Mark King, Yehoshua Silberstein, Andrew Hughes, Jimmy Jung
Nonvoting - Eric Thompson
Staff - Amanda Gay, Kay Chopard
Guests - Lisa Balzereit
Quorum determination
Meeting is quorate when 50% + 1 of voting participants attend
There are <<9>> voters as of <<2024-02-01>>
Approval of Prior Minutes
Motion to approve meeting minutes listed below:
...
Link to draft minutes and outcome | Discussion |
---|
| |
\uD83D\uDDE3 Discussion topics
Time | Item | Presenter | Notes |
---|
| Kantara Updates | Kay Chopard | Board of Directors Planning Session - The focus was on maturity of the organization and strategic business planning regarding Kantara’s direction. Questions included “Where is the market going?” “ What is the need?” “What are the things we could be doing?” New BoD in place - Changes: Maria Vachino stepped down. Eve Maler and Mike Magrath are new board members. Conference proposals went out this month
|
| | Andrew/Yehoshua | No feedback other than emails from Mark King. Questions: Should we process what we have so far and send in, or are there topics we need to focus on? Should we conduct a straight mapping or are there discussion gaps? Yehoshua notes that for the most part, the EU is less prescriptive than the US. From the US perspective, we could let it play out. The gaps are coming from the other side.
Is there any mileage to sneak in comments of 800-63 rev 4 by commenting on this? Yehoshua notes this could make matters confusing, but it does provide insight into how they are thinking of certain issues. (Example: Address of Record and Binding)
Mark King notes a meeting on February 22nd (note below) to discuss this in an open session and that it seems NIST Is matching things that don’t quite exist. He sent a new submission with input from Richard Wilsher, but essentially the scope needs more definition. Kay - Just met with NIST, poses considering looking at definitions and that EU uses more international standards. Could things be inserted into rev 4? Group reminder: February 22, EU-US TTC WG-1 (Working Group 1) Webinar: Unpacking the Digital Identity Mapping Results (registration details coming soon) A final discussion will take place on February 15, 2024, and comments will be consolidated before the deadline on February 29, 2024.
|
| | Andrew/Amanda | Confirmed completion, notified LC. |
| | Andrew/Yehoshua | Next Steps (See ACTION item as well): February 8 IAWG - ask for a motion to approve. If there are no objections, send to the ARB, recommending that we adopt this as Kantara’s stance. If there are no objections, ask Kay to bring it to NIST as IAWG’s stance on Address of Record.
|
| AOB: ISO standards/NIST/Kantara - ISO 29003 (identity proofing) | Andrew | |
✅ Open Action items
- Yehoshua/Amanda will prepare the final revision to the Address of Record position and circulate to IAWG listserv as IAWG’s position.
...
Task report |
---|
pageSize | 10 |
---|
isMissingRequiredParameters | true |
---|
labels | |
---|
|
⤴ Decisions