Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Migration of unmigrated content due to installation of a new plugin

UMA telecon 2010-11-11

Table of Contents
maxLevel4
minLevel3
maxLevel4

Date and Time

  • WG telecon on Thursday, 11 Nov 2010, at 9-10:30am PT (time chart)
    • Skype line "C": +9900827042954214
    • US: +1-201-793-9022 | Room Code: 295-4214

Agenda

  • Roll call
  • Approve minutes of 2010-10-28 and 2010-11-01 meetings
  • Action item review
  • Brief updates from the wider UMA world
  • Review and discuss progress from last F2F
    • Review revised resource/scope registration proposal with RESTful interface
    • Make conclusions about issues raised at the end of the F2F (see notes)
    • Capture any new user stories being discussed
  • Line up next set of spec issue priorities
  • AOB

...

  • Christian Scholz
  • Eve Maler

Minutes

Roll call

Quorum was met (late in the meeting).

Approve minutes of 2010-10-28 and 2010-11-01 meetings

Deferred.

Action item review

  • 2010-11-01-1 Alan Open Write up backup service/copy service use case, with reference to requester delegate scenario. Now closed.

...

The flow for the user is also discussed - i.e. should we have a flow where a user is redirected to the AM to define policies for resources that are meant to be policy protected or could the host simply register a resource and some sort of a default policy would be associated with a resource (no redirection would occur). Maciej and Lukasz think that the step of redirection is necessary and it might be meaningless for the user to see simply see that a resource is now “Protected” (but how protected?). George gives an example, that by resigning from such a redirection we would allow for registering groups of resources easily (the user would not be redirected to the AM after the host registeres a single resource). Maciej thinks this might be solved differently when a single registration request is issued by the host to the AM.

There is a question then - should we specify only the Host <-> AM request/reply protocol and define the user redirection step as optional?

Resource identifiers are then discussed - URIs vs arbitrary strings. The AM only needs to know identifiers of resources - there’s no way the AM will know how resources are organized at the Host.

Next Meetings

  • WG telecon on Thursday, 18 Nov 2010, at 9-10:30am PT (time chart)