Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

As I promised during the last IAWG call I have identified how the 12 comments IAWG made on the initial version of the Pan Canadian Trust Framework (PCTF) Verified Login Componernt were handled. The attached document is what IAWG submitted with its comments and how they were addressed by DIACC.

In summary, 8 were accepted and resulted in changes, 2 were deferred, and 2 were rejected.

As was discussed during the last meeting, could you put together an eballot to voting members to determine if they wish to pursue developing comments on the current version?

Go to start of metadata

Background: 
  • Ken Dagg has identified how the 12 comments IAWG made on the initial version of the Pan Canadian Trust Framework (PCTF) Verified Login Component were handled.
This document is what
  • See IAWG submitted
with its
  • comments and how they were addressed by
DIACC: 
eballot
  • eBallot should be released to voting members to determine if they wish to pursue developing comments on the current version

PCTF Verified Login Component Overview Draft Recommendation V1.0

PCTF Verified Login Conformance Profile Draft Recommendation V1.

DIACC Call for Comment

0

Motion:To develop comments on
the current 
PCTF Verified Login Component Overview & Conformance Profile version 1.0 
VOTE

Please cast your vote below. IMPORTANT: in order to record your vote you need to log in into Confluence.

Note: In the above e-vote table you will also have access to real-time voting results

.v2

.

0Document Date: Document URL: https://kantarainitiative.github.io/SAMLprofiles/saml2int.html

2019-09-09

Ballot Opens:

Ballot Closes:

December

6

13, 2019 


December

13

17, 2019

Voting Rules A Majority of the total number of eligible voters must vote. Please see voting participants and quorum here: Participant Roster