Date
15
IPR
Thank you for joining the call today.
...
Again, if you are uncertain about any matters, please remain silent and do not contribute anything in writing.
Attendees
...
- Salvatore D'Agostino (Unlicensed)
- Vitor Jesus
- Harsh
- Anadi Pandharkar
- Xiaohu Zhou
- Timothy Reiniger
- Tom Jones
- Former user (Deleted)Colin Wallis (Unlicensed)
Goals (revisit)
- Call for Agenda Items
- Use case Update
- Spec, update
Discussion items
...
Interesting discussion on use case today, continuing to highlight the gaps, with different business, legal and technical perspective,
- Review of the Use case
- moved across the 3 different use cases
- brought up UMA and other other elements that are referred to use case 3
- We jumped around a bit
- the aim of the call is to start with the first use case and walk step by step approach through the layers of complexity that were brought up on the call.
- discussed a cookie use case and legal requirements
- The aim with the use cases is to address the gap
- moved across the 3 different use cases
- We had an update
- with the first use case
- then moving to the second and third use case.
- Actions:
- work on the spec contribution for next week
- working more specification
- brief UMA - call on the work approach
Brief UMA on relationship of work on call 22 April 2020.
Discussion of what is legal vs illegal and its impact on effort here and specification development.
Former user (Deleted) I think you should be agnostic as to the payloaad of a consent http://www.commonaccord.org/index.php?action=source&file=G/GA4GH/Demo/Geraldine_Graber_DE
AOB
Presentation at