Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Date

2016-12-01


Approved at: 2019-12-12 Meeting notes (CR) DRAFT

Attendees

Voting

Non-Voting

  • David Turner

 


Info
titleQuorum Status
Meeting (( did / did not )) achieve quorum .

 

...

at any specific point during the call.



Info
titleVoting participants

Participant Roster (2016) - Quorum is 4 of 7 as of 2016-10-06

Iain Henderson, Mary Hodder, Harri Honko, Mark Lizar, Jim Pasquale, John Wunderlich, Andrew Hughes

Discussion Items

 


TimeItemWhoNotes
10 mins
  • Roll call
  • Agenda bashing
  • Meeting minutes approval

Meeting was not quorate - no minutes approval today.

  • Prior minutes requiring approval
DRAFT
DRAFT

 


15 min
  • Reviewed Introduction text edits
  • The next version should include a 'real' data model
  • David will finalize editorial changes; update new scheme; updating the new fields as required; including sample files; update the field order in the document
  • Consistency and formatting finalization
  • John will finalize the samples by December 5
  • David will finalize text on December 6
  • Aim for WG ballot December 7-13
  • Aim for LC ballot December 14-30
  • Aim for Start of All Member ballot January 2, 2017
15 minDiscussion on what's next on the roadmapAll
We assume that there will be
  • The list of subject areas that will be worked on:
    • Consent Receipt
      • There will be CR spec errata that will need to be fixed
We also assume that a
      • A v1.1 will be required within 6 months after feedback from implementers
Possible items
    • User Submitted Terms
      • Use case library and elaboration of use cases
      • UX design
      • Model contract language to support each feature of the UST elements
    • Requirements for API / Interfaces for CR and UST artifacts
    • Requirements (text) for implementers of Consent receipt generators (code)
    • Requirements (text) for Consent receipt 'viewer' (code)
    • Information Sharing Agreements
      • Architecture and model (text and diagrams)
      • Requirements (text)
    Functional
          • Business requirements
      Business
              • Functional requirements
              • Non-functional requirements
          • Specifications (text)
        • Build a Kantara prototype implementation of a consent receipt management system
      15 minDiscussion about changing the CIS WG structure after CR v1.0
       

      ...

      Defer


      CR Spec publication schedule

      Current: call for comments on draft spec commences

      Date
      Event
      Status
      September 19Close of business (Pacific) deadline for feedback on spec draft including examples and feedback from implementers.
       

      September 22WG call to review CR draft structure
       

      September 29WG call to review CR draft and discuss items needing resolution
       

      October 6WG call
       

      October 13WG call
       

      October 20Candidate draft to WG. 
      Decision required if the draft is sufficiently mature to base an IIW session on it.
       

      October 27Final working session for WG (with/without IIW comments) on candidate draft
       

      November 3

      Final draft for WG review

       

      November 10

      Working group ballot - must be approved by WG on Nov 10th

      WG Meeting decision: Working group electronic ballot opens on Monday November 14 - to close end of day Monday November 21 2016

       

      November 15Once CR v1.0 approved by WG, Send doc to the Leadership Council. They must approve it by Nov 30.
       

      December 1NOTE: The draft has outstanding issues that the WG would like to have resolved prior to going for ballot.
        


      Working group ballot
        


      LC Electronic Ballot opens
        


      LC Approval decision
        


      Kantara all member ballot begins.
        


      Earliest Spec approval date