ULX Telecon 2010-05-26
| Table of Contents | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Logistics
...
JB: "Connect" has become even more political, so that's a reason against. "Connect," according to Google and Facebook, is such that there is bi-directional flow and not just "login", so that's another reason against.
Conclusion: Let's dodge table (for now) forcing RPs to some standard icon, at least for now. In other words leave the v4 mockups the way they are in v4.
V4 didn't add a "help" or "what's this" link
...
TA: How about a question mark just to the left of the close box, with the results of the click populating the overlay frame (rather than taking users to another full page, or pop-up)
PT: I like Trent's suggestion of a small question mark just to the left of the close box
...
TA: I though it was valuable that it illustrates the number of options. Perhaps there's a text link right next to that # of text that says "show all".
SC: perhaps Perhaps need a heuristic on how to present.
TA: Yes, if there are a huge number, then it could become a hierarchy
BS: scroll Scroll bar (v.s. paging). This will not meet the Canadian accessibility guidelines and he THINKS it won't meet the W3C accessibility guidelines.
...
TA: There is some value to letting you know what you signed in with last time, but the little icon isn't enough. At the least some kind of confirmation "you signed in with Google last time, sign in again"
...
TA: I would stop short of promoting the favicon in the bar. If you ask people show people a print-out of this page and ask "if you click this, what do you think this will do?" you'd get different answers.
...
SC: Yes, we've found that the deployers argue for fewer clicks, but actually they have more support
PT: Hmm… now that I think about it, we went through something similar in designing the Azigo selector and concluded that the extra click was actually better.
Conclusion: unanimously agreed to eliminate this flow/option entirely.
...
Singin-Nth-time-all-options
...
This new screen showed a list of the (two) previously used accounts in an upper area, and all other choices in a lower area.
Conclusion: Everyone agreed that this one is good. Further, since the consensus was to eliminate the flow with the favicon on the toolbar (see previous section). Two flows instead of three is simpler too.
...
New aspect ratio and consistent icon size
...
Version 4 used new aspect ratio and account icon size.
JB: The trick will be getting the bitmap from
PT: Hmm: This IS the "new" proposed IMI card display size
SC: I'm not convinced that an active client should necessarily display these.
3) Merger of IdP + ULX has been approved
Action Items
- Valeska create a revised version of the v4 mockupshttp://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/display/ulx/Web+Mockup+Statement+of+Work#WebMockupStatementofWork-StatementofWork%233
- Paul to create a doodle/email to find a new (better) time for next week's ULX call (from now on)
- Paul to create a ulx:new SOW #4 for Kevin to implement the revised v4 mockups