...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
Date
2020-06-03
IPR
Thank you for joining the call today.
...
Again, if you are uncertain about any matters, please remain silent and do not contribute anything in writing.
Attendees
- Salvatore D'Agostino (Unlicensed).
- @Salvatore D'Agostino
- @Oscar Santolalla
- @Colin Wallis
- @xiaohu
- @Vitor Jesus
- @Harshvardhan J. Pandit
- @James Hazard
- @Timothy Reiniger
- Ken Klingenstein (Unlicensed)
Topics
- Feedback on PrivMas
- ISO to DPV - Consent Receipt - An Extension - and Interim Output
- DPVCG - gets the input from Kantara -
- Mark Lizar (Unlicensed) going to update the ISO
→ GDPR -> DPV
- Mark Lizar (Unlicensed) going to update the ISO
- DPVCG - gets the input from Kantara -
- Former user (Deleted) Discussing a system of harmonisation of records and links -
- map a simple graph approach into these taxonomies -
- express these linked records in a data sharing framework.
- Summer Project - DPV to GA4GH, a mapping project -
- GA4GH
- Taxonomy for privacy concerns
- provides limitations -e.g.
- Re-contact
- re-use
- provides limitations -e.g.
- DPV - Can help - with Vocabulary
- data protection vocabulary
- Taxonomy for privacy concerns
- GA4GH
- Colin -brings up - keep it clear about IPR
- Harsh - brings up IPR
- contribution
- reference
- a member - post it to another org
- Mark to looking into using DPV in W3C with ISO
- Harsh - brings up IPR
- James - bring ups Central Bank efforts - GLIEF and Actus - assert all flows of money can be modelled on 31 paradigms -
- how does this fit in with other standards .
- DPV is definitely a key part
- Legal Entity - is a critical part
- universal taxonomy -
...
- DPV → DUO
it is a simple as presenting the specified categories for Medical research (from GA4GH) so that they can be mapped with the DPV, and then presented back to that W3C list for comment.
But, this does bring up a lot of questions we should conside, and we should definitely confirm what the objective is before we start.
Are we looking to be able to specify the same explicit consent research with DUO, but with the DPV?
- DUO purposes do not translate into purposes -
- DUO - combines purpose and processing
- We would have to include both to be able to make a consent receipt for DUO
- DUO - combines purpose and processing
- Restriction - are added as labels
- DUO- Schema -
- can put restriction of sharing - data can only be shared - when doing collaboration with a specific research -
- how to restrict -
Can we use the privacy agreement to specify the consent for genomic research ? -
would be usable in the GA4GH ecosystem ?
- DUO purposes do not translate into purposes -
- Starting point
- lets test map a unified approach
- to legal documents
Should it be a DLC reference implementation, with a review of the Privacy Agreement for Common Accord, and perhaps a round of feedback from key stakeholders?
Decisions
Action items
- Tabled: Until - - Former user (Deleted) Mark Lizar (Unlicensed) research and arrange mtg follow up
- Mark Lizar (Unlicensed) and Former user (Deleted)
- Anadi has been tasked with mapping Unified to DUO
- This is also a part of the summer project
- Discussed breaking some DUO labels down for DPV as a starting point -
- DUO is centralised federated data access framework with data access administered by federated identity Silo
- in contrast DPV is a personal data control vocabulary framework - for which the labels can then be apart of decentralised data access framework .
(great to see this project naturally progressing)