Page Comparison

Attendees

Voting participants: Jose Lopez, Zentry;  Scott Shorter, Vice Chair; Ken Dagg, Chair; Richard Wilsher, Zygma Zygma; Mark Hapner, Resielient

Staff: Colin Wallis Wallis; Ruth Puente

1. Administration:
   Roll Call
   Agenda Confirmation
   Minutes Approval: 2018-02-22 DRAFT IAWG Minutes
   Action Item Review: action item list
   Organization Updates - Director's Corner
   Staff reports and updates
   LC reports and updates
   Call for Tweet-worthy items to feed (@KantaraNews or #kantara)
2. Discussion

a. Approval of IAF-1410 and IAF-1420

Quorum: There was quorum (5 voting participants out of 8)

Minutes Approval

2018-02-22 DRAFT IAWG Minutes were approved by motion. (SS made the motion and was seconded by MH)

...

• SAC for 800-63-3 out for LC vote.  
• 4 new members joined Kantara this year.
• TFS Sync: there is a proposal to work on 800-63-3 Identity evidence examples. CW had a call with NIST, which commented that they have been working on creating the list of identity evidence. 
• Increased number of downloaddownloads, UMA and , Consent Receipt the majority and Blockchain and Smart Contracts are the top ones.

Approval of 1410 and 1420

• CW pointed out that the 'Notice' section text has conflicts with the current IPR policy (version 2.0) on the derivative works. The Notice text says 'no derivative works' but the IPR policy ARTICLE 3 COPYRIGHT allows derivative works (3rd line) https://kantarainitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/KantaraInitiativeIPRPolicies_V2.0.pdf It was agreed that a rewording of that section was needed, so CW will provide a new wording for that. 
• After the review of revised IAF 1410 v0.3.0 and IAF 1420 v0.3.0 the IAWG approved the documents subject to the new text that CW will provide for the 'Notice' Section to clarify the IPR policy description. 
• Revised Documents:

...

•   Kantara IAF-1410 Commonly-Applicable Service Assessment Criteria v0.3.0.docx  and  

...

• Kantara IAF-1420 Operational 63-2 Service Assessment Criteria v0.3.0.docx

Any other Business 

• MH commented that once the Real ID specific, once they are is issued, NIST should see how to fit it into 800-63-3. RW what it is asking of issuers that made the following questions: what makes a real Real ID credential better than the pre-existing forms, ; what would allow states to be variable in the implementation? MH responded that from the basic proofing aspect, the requirements are based on citizenship criteria and all of the other variations on how a person is legally in the country  (passport or birth certificate, social security card, which should be validated with the issuing agencies, also proof of address that needs to be validated, digital photo, etc.) There are 17 security factors integrated into the credential itself.  He could not find the security elements. He added that he will provide a written explanation in the following meeting.
• KD commented about the news 'US carriers testing replacement for two-factor authentication' and pointed out that it will probably affect us. 

Next meeting: March 15