Status | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
...
Date
Attendees
See the Participant roster
Voting (4 of 7 required for quorum)
Participant | Attending | |
---|---|---|
1 | Chaudhury, Atef / Krishnaraj, Venkat | X |
2 | Davis, Peter | |
3 | Hughes, Andrew | |
4 | Jones, Thomas | X |
5 | Thoma, Andreas | X |
6 | Wunderlich, John | X |
7 | Williams, Christopher | X |
Non-Voting
Participant | Attending | |
---|---|---|
1 | Auld, Lorrayne | |
2 | Aronson Mark | |
3 | Balfanz, Dirk | |
4 | Brudnicki, David | |
5 | D'Agostino, Salvatore | |
6 | Dowtin, Jazzmine | |
7 | Dutta, Tim | |
8 | Flanagan, Heather | |
9 | Fleenor, Judith | |
10 | Glasscock, Amy | |
11 | Gropper, Adrian | |
12 | Hodges, Gail | |
13 | Jordaan, Loffie | |
14 | LeVasseur, Lisa | |
15 | Lopez, Cristina Timon | |
16 | Pasquale, Jim | |
17 | Snell, Oliver | |
18 | Stowell, Therese | |
19 | Sutor, Hannah | X |
20 | Tamanini, Greg | |
21 | Vachino, Maria | |
22 | Whysel, Noreen |
Goals
Check-in on work progress
Review draft outline and status of writing tasks
Discussion items (AKA Agenda)
Time | Item | Who | Notes | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5 min. |
| Called to order: 13:03 Quorum reached: 4 of 7 Minutes to approve: Approved 2023-08-30 Meeting notes - Draft2023-09-06 Meeting notes - Draft | |||||||||
5 min. | Open Tasks Review | All |
| ||||||||
5 min | Announcements | Hannah Sutor has joined as a technical editor. Her first order of business is to produce a version of the draft implementor’s report ready for LC vote (after final review by work group once draft is ready). Moving to bi-weekly cadence to allow for asynchronous contributions and discussion on requirements content. The bi-weekly meetings will be to resove issues raised in the contents (currently a shared google sheet). User b300f John Wunderlich To share google sheet with group | |||||||||
35 min | Requirements discussion | When is V1 ready? Christopher Williams For the group to consider when there is at least one requirement for each privacy principle and each of Verifier, Issuer, and Provider Atef points out that we are heavily weighted to Verifier requirements and this needs to be addressed Andreas comments that 1_IP_CC description does not align with 18013-5. Christopher suggest that Andreas makes a suggestion to test out our commenting system. Planned timeline:
| |||||||||
10 minutes | Other Business | ||||||||||
Adjourn | 13:40 |
Next meeting
Action items
- John Wunderlich and Hannah Sutor - Draft implementer’s report ready for next week
- John Wunderlich and Christopher - email and google sheet to solicit new requirements