Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Date

May 20, 2014

...

  • Consent Receipt Spec Intro Dev and review  - 10 min
  • review and further develop intro to the specification - 15 min
  • Define Terms - Michiel v. John terms - review the terms and approaches by both 
  • Tech Task - Create this  Specification in a CISWG Git Hub Page (with the CISWG License) (note: email sent to Oliver to do this)
  • Link spec to CISWG wiki (how should we do this?)
  • Plan the next steps to creating the specification and developing a working demo

...

Link to the

...

The purpose of the MVC specification (or the consent receipt header)  is to standardise the recordation of consent and the  collection of consent specific policy links. As well as to make standard a link to withdraw consent.

The first section (or header) of the consent receipt provides the basic needed information to record that a consent provision, and the policies under which it was provided. This header is what we have called in the past the MVC. 

The second part of the consent receipt is intended to draw out (from the policies) the minimum (or common) legally required notice requirements for consent and to display or link to these in the policy.  Either with a direct link to the policy and the relevant section or by scraping the policy and entering it here. All of the notice requirements for consent by jurisdiction and industry are to found in a reference document called the "Consent Notice Map". https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1bn5Dz9sNfwOOvLqAhxdgKWlcm8j4C_jndItF0Q2dA14/edit?usp=sharing

(Note: The theory being that the header provides the sources of information needed for the rest of the receipt ) 

The third section 

Consent Receipt Demo Button Review Terms

https://github.com/Open-Notice/consent-receipt/tree/master

Section 1

Terms in the Receipt So far (from Hack May 10) MVC Receipt
--Timestamp
--UserID
-- Location - ( Consent DialogUrl: (the url of the consent dialog)
-- Plocaton - (NA) 
--Revoke consent URL

--Policy URLS that have a been agreed to
--Json signature

  • Preferences Captured from User

 

Section 2: (I for implied and E explicit)  (implied and explicit consent) 

  • Purpose
  • Contact of the Data Controller
  • Jurisdiction in which Data Controller is held accountable (e.g. court) 
  • Jurisdiction data is stored in
  • Jurisdiction of the data subject
  • Type of personal of personal information being collected

Section 3 Extensions

two types of extensions are predicted to be here. 

  1. notice requirement extensions for jurisdictions, industry specific, or type of personal information specific notice requirements. 
  2. Preference management links - e.g. DNT, Withdraw Consent, Block Use of Data use, (Note: these vary by jurisdiction)

 

Input from John for Spec

Consolidate above. 

Version: 1.0

 

**Abstract**

A consent receipt is a record of a transaction between a data subject and a data processor. In the transaction the data processor will have collected personal information from the data subject. The consent receipt documents what data processing the data subject has consented to, implicitly or explicitly, in the transaction. It can be provided to the data subject at the time of the transaction, or on request from the data subject.

 

**Specification**

( Key:value pairs?)

- Header info

- Processor ID 

- User ID

- Transaction ID

- Date

- Consent type

- Data collected 

- Data Processing consented to

 

***Expected information***

(From work to date)

...

Specification Draft we are working on : Open Notice Consent Receipt Spec v.01

 

Notes/Things to address 

...

  • Implied or Implicit consent 
    • John suggest that we create space for implied consent in the original spec so that we can further extend the same spec in the future. 
    • Mark suggested that the URL (location of data controller) be defined as location of consent so that this could be the URL of the consent option and in the future be useful for location of physical spaces with policies/notices that equate to implied consent. 
    • Discussed extending section 2 with ( E & I) E for explicit, I for implied, and that we leave implied open, as for physical location we can make a PLocation field in the header, but leave this blank
  • A separate section for Capturing the consent preferences from the user in the consent session
    • e.g. DNT (at the moment this is in the header, but should this be moved to a section 4?  A report section of the receipt ? 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Items

TimeItemWhoNotes
    

Action Items

...