Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Attendees

Discussion items

ItemNotes
Roll CallThere was not quorum
Approval of MinutesMinutes of December 21, 12 and 7 meeting noteswere approved.
ED Update
  • CW had a call with Jim Sheere at GSA. They noted the comments and understood people´s concerns. Talked about , he mentioned a policy report on digital id policy ID out of OMB, as soon as that is announced it should be circulated in the community. ComVa Austrtalia Digital id
  • He provided news on identity schemes:
    -ComVa (state framework);
    -Australia released the Digital Identity trust framework for public review on Christmas, the plan is to invite the Australians to KI e-gov WG . (the framework contains 14 documents. NZ holding Digital 5 group os UK, south korea, nz, Estonia, Israel. ).
    -New Zealand is leading Digital 5 Group (UK, South Korea, Estonia, Israel and New Zealand).
    -eIDAS: Germany notified in the eIDAS (. Meaning of "notify" in this case: whether the scheme is from private sector or public sector scheme, the member state has to state behind it) we re , they confirm that they are confortable and accept the liability for issues with it.
  • GDPR coming soon.
  • UK verify not great shape. Financial ss in the UK .
  • UK is looking to build alternative or extension to create sth something for the financial ssservices.
  • CW suggested to take a look at the new KI website content under Trust Operations.
  • Implementation of New membership structure and .
  • Testing on online joining system we are testing, that will allow to join with paypal Paypal and credit car card (through open source CRM).

LC UpdateLast
  • KD commented that last Director´s Corner
-
  • is a summary of what the various WGs have done, several publications (different specifications and criteria on 800-63-3).
800-63 A/B_SAC
  • KD said that we received a few comments during Public Review Period.
KD believes
  • Also, he added that the shortcomings or errors are from NIST, so we would not need to change nothing to the criteria.
SS pointed out observations of different types of errors, maybe

  • IAWG reviewed 45-day Public Review 63A/B_SAC - first draft Disposition of Comments, and provided a week to make a final review and approve the disposition on February 8. 

  • SS suggested that it would be useful to write a KI IAWG white paper
out
  • with examples of SUPERIOR, FAIR and STRONG (for example US passport, if we use the chip that means superior, and explain why), work item for later.

Action items

  •  


  • Timeline towards publication of 63A/B_SAC:

-NIST Deadline: March 21
-Approve Disposition of Comments Feb 8 at the latest 
-Send to LC Feb 14 at the latest 
-Open All member ballot by Feb 21 at the latest 


  • RW suggested IAWG reviews how KI is classifying classes of approval, available at KI Website Classes of Approval 

  • RW recommended to make a non material change of current CO_SAC in order to have revised CO-SAC + 63A/B_SAC (Move criteria from CO-SAC to OP-SAC and put it in 2 different documents, it would be a parallel task in the 7 weeks we have).

  • CW commented that Publication of 63A/B_SAC would be only available for members in good standing.