Versions Compared

Old Version 9

changes.mady.by.user John Wunderlich

Saved on

compared with

New Version Current

changes.mady.by.user John Wunderlich

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Status
colourYellowGreen
titleDraftApproved

...

Date

Attendees

See the Participant roster

Voting (4 of 7 required for quorum)

Participant

Attending

1

Chaudhury, Atef / Krishnaraj, Venkat

X

2

Davis, Peter

3

Hughes, Andrew

4

Jones, Thomas

X

5

Thoma, Andreas

X

6

Wunderlich, John

X

7

Williams, Christopher

X

Non-Voting

Participant

Attending

1

Auld, Lorrayne

2

Aronson Mark

3

Balfanz, Dirk

4

Brudnicki, David

5

D'Agostino, Salvatore

6

Dowtin, Jazzmine

7

Dutta, Tim

8

Flanagan, Heather

9

Fleenor, Judith

10

Glasscock, Amy

11

Gropper, Adrian

12

Hodges, Gail

13

Jordaan, Loffie

14

LeVasseur, Lisa

15

Lopez, Cristina Timon

16

Pasquale, Jim

17

Snell, Oliver

18

Stowell, Therese

19

Sutor, Hannah

X

20

Tamanini, Greg

21

Vachino, Maria

22

Whysel, Noreen

Goals

  • Check-in on work progress

  • Review draft outline and status of writing tasks

Discussion items (AKA Agenda)

Time

Item

Who

Notes

5 min.

  • Start the meeting.

  • Call to order.

  • Approve minute

  • Approve agenda

Christopher Williams

Called to order: 13:03

Quorum reached: 4 of 7

Minutes to approve: Approved

2023-08-30 Meeting notes - Draft2023-09-06 Meeting notes - Draft

5 min.

Open Tasks Review

All

Task report
spacesPEMCP
isMissingRequiredParameterstrue
labelsmeeting-notes

5 min

Announcements

Hannah Sutor has joined as a technical editor. Her first order of business is to produce a version of the draft implementor’s report ready for LC vote (after final review by work group once draft is ready).

Moving to bi-weekly cadence to allow for asynchronous contributions and discussion on requirements content. The bi-weekly meetings will be to resove issues raised in the contents (currently a shared google sheet).

John Wunderlich To share google sheet with group

35 min

Requirements discussion

When is V1 ready?

Christopher Williams For the group to consider when there is at least one requirement for each privacy principle and each of Verifier, Issuer, and Provider

Atef points out that we are heavily weighted to Verifier requirements and this needs to be addressed

Andreas comments that 1_IP_CC description does not align with 18013-5. Christopher suggest that Andreas makes a suggestion to test out our commenting system.

Planned timeline:

  • Version 1 of the Requirements will require one requirement for each of the V, I, and P in each privacy principle

  • Target date for contributions Nov. 30

  • December discussion

  • January vote

10 minutes

Other Business

Adjourn


13:40

Next meeting

Action items