Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Parts 1 and 2 for measuring conformance, compliance, and performance of Dynamic of Transparency and Consent

Anchor
_Toc155867426
_Toc155867426
Conformity & Compliance

...

Scheme Framework v0.9.3.8

ANCR refers to an Anchored Notice & Consent Receipt, it is a record that is generated using the Transparency Performance Indicator assessment, which provides a standard measure of operational performance of the present PII Controller’s security and privacy session information.

...

This specification relies on (open access to) ISO/IEC 29100 Security techniques, Privacy framework and ISO/IEC 29184 online privacy notices and consent, and the Consent Notice Receipt in the Appendix B, further specified by ANCR Mirrored Record Information Structure,3 Consent Notice Receipt Format as specified in the Kantara Initiative ANCR WG Mirrored Record information structure, extending the CISWG MVCR and Consent Receipt v1.1.4

Anchor
_Toc155867428
_Toc155867428
Conditions for use

License Condition:

This document has been prepared by participants of Kantara Initiative Inc. ANCR-WG. No rights are granted to prepare derivative works of this Scheme outside of the ANCR WG. Entities seeking permission to reproduce this document, in whole or in part, for other uses must contact the Kantara Initiative to determine whether an appropriate license for such use is available.

...

Part 1 of the scheme introduces 4 Transparency Performance Indicators; these are used to measure and rate the conformance of transparency.  In Part 2 of the scheme (in the Appendix A) a transparency information request is sent to the controller to; a) test the controller information and, b) measure how compliant the performance of digital transparency is, to both legal expectations, and the personal privacy expectations of the PII Principal.   

Anchor
_Toc155867432
_Toc155867432
Terms & Definitions

ISO/IEC 29100 is also normative, this security and privacy framework standard maps terms in the standard itself, for example PII Principal is mapped to the Data Subject.

...

Anchor
_Toc155867437
_Toc155867437

4 TPI’s

The 4 Transparency Performance Indicators capture transparency and data capture practices in context and are used to test the self-asserted information for its operational usability.

...

This is a 1.0 document; we look forward to its evolution.

Anchor
_Toc155867448
_Toc155867448
TPI Compliance Assessment Scheme Part 2

Anchor
_Toc155867449
_Toc155867449
Operational Transparency Assessment

The following describes an assessment using the TPIs to measure Operational Transparency and assurance.

...

  1. Transparency is required to be available in context, i.e., during the time when PII is obtained (found in Transparency Statement or Privacy Policy).8

    1. Time period data stored.

    2. Existence of rights/controls to access and rectify.

    3. Existence of right to manage consent.

    4. Existence of right to lodge a complaint with a Data Protection Authority (DPA).

    5. Whether processing is based under a statutory, or contractual context, or whether necessary for entering a contract, if the PII is obliged, and the consequences of failure to provide this data.9

    6. Existence of

      1. AI, or any automated decision-making technology

      2. Digital identity management surveillance technologies

      3. Any profiles, or graphs generated

      4. Meaningful information about the logic involved

        1. Significance in overall policy or processing and decision making

        2. Expected consequences for and to PII Principal - Data Subject

Anchor
_Toc155867450
_Toc155867450
TPI Assessment Guidance

The TPI Rating system is designed to measure the operational performance of the information, for example if only a mailing address is provided for a privacy contact on a website, this is considered non-operable according to the context. This means that privacy access and specific information is not retrievable in the context of data collection. The TPIs measure adequacy and demonstrate non-performance by PII Controllers as a form of data co-governance.

The associated Conformity Assessment: uses the open ISO/IEC 29100 security framework for generating interoperable records and receipts of data processing activity, according to transparency in context.

Anchor
_Toc155867451
_Toc155867451
TPIs are captured in sequence

a. TPI 1 measuring the point when the individual is notified versus when personal information/digital identifiers are collected and processed. The scheme starts by capturing the timing of notice presentation in relation to first data capture, and first contact.10

...

Combined, these TPIs provide an overall Indication of the operational state of digital privacy.

Anchor
_Toc155867452
_Toc155867452
TPI – Scheme 1, Part 1(S1-P1) metric logic

Rating - Instruction

TPI 1 Timing (with regards to processing)

TPI 2 Required Information

TPI 3 Accessibility

TPI 4 - Digital Security

+1 (assured)

PII Controller credential is displayed, using a standard format with machine readable language, and linked, for example, in an http header in a browser

The Controller is discoverable prior to session (out of band) in a machine-readable format:

1.Controller Registry

2.A client-side record of processing (via a wallet or browser)

Controller identity is presented prior to data collection

Security is required prior to collection (digital wallet based)

 

0 (dynamic assurance)

PII Controller Identity or credential is provided in first notice

Credential is presented just in time (automated check and first-time notice)

Embedded as a credential and dynamically available upon access (almost just in time)

Assurance provided– e.g., certificate is specific to and matches controller and context.

-1 (analogue assurance - online)

The Controller Identity, or screen with the Controller Identity is one screen and click away. For example, the privacy policy link in the footer of a webpage

Controller information is accessible (not presented) during collection

PII Controller Identity prominently displayed on first view – prior to processing first page of viewing

Not-specific to controller - does not match jurisdiction.

-2 - (not mandatory in flow)

 

Controller Credential information is linked during collection

is linked not presented

Does not match OU

-3 (non-operative)

PII Controller Identity is not accessible enough to be considered ‘provided’

Controller information not present

Identity or credential is not accessible in context - e.g., two or more screens of view away, or privacy contact is mailing g address and non-operative in context of data collection.

It is not a valid, secure, or recognized provider.
Not security operational (proving nonreciprocal security assurance)

Anchor
_Toc155867453
_Toc155867453
1.2.    Table 2: ANCR Mirrored Record Schema Example

This appendix is an example of a notice record and the schema and can be used as a template for the information record, rating, and analysis.

...

FIELD NAME

FIELD DESCRIPTION

REQUIREMENT: MUST, SHALL, MAY

FIELD DATA EXAMPLE

Notice Location

Location the notice was read/observed

MUST

http://Walmart.com (actual link)

PII Controller Name

Name of presented business

MUST

Walmart

Controller Address

The physical address of controller and/or accountable person

MUST

1940 Argentina Road Mississauga, Ontario L5N 1P9

PII Controller Contact Type

Contact method for correspondence with PII Controller

MUST

Email, phone

PII Controller-Correspondence Contact

General contact point

SHALL

Privacy@org.com

Privacy Contact Type

The Contact method provided for access to privacy contact

MUST

Email, or other

Privacy Contact Point

Location/address of Contact Point

MUST

Org.com/privacy.html

Session Certificate

A certificate for monitored practice

Optional

TLS, Transparency, Policy (OID) Context

Anchor
_Toc155867454
_Toc155867454
Digital Transparency Code of Conduct

These digital transparency code of conduct rules coincide with the TPIs presented and reference the international adequacy requirements for transparency required for digital identifier management. In Report on the Adequacy of Digital Identity Governance for cross border transparency and consent:

...

  1. Provide their PII Controller Notice Credentials, before or at the time of processing personal information (TPI 1), Article 14.1

  2. PII Controller credential information must be accessible

  3. PII Controller credential information must be operationally capable for access to rights with evidence of notice & consent

  4. The security context must match the controller’s jurisdiction where it is assumed PII is processed

Anchor
_Toc155867455
_Toc155867455
Appendix D. References

Council of Europe 108+

Anchor
_Toc155867456
_Toc155867456
Appendix F. ISO scheme Profile

Anchor
_Toc155867457
_Toc155867457

...

3 Mirrored Record Information Structure, 2024, ANCR WG Kantara Initiative { ANCR: Mirrored Record : Consent Receipt V2: Consent Token Information Structure v0.7 }

4 Consent receipt v1, CISWG Kantara Initiative https://kantarainitiative.org/download/7902/

...