Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Status
colourYellowGreen
titleDraftApproved

...

Date

Attendees

See the Participant roster

Voting (4 of 7 required for quorum)

Participant

Attending

1

Chaudhury, Atef / Krishnaraj, Venkat

2

Davis, Peter

3

Hughes, Andrew

4

Jones, Thomas

X

5

Thoma, Andreas

Regrets

6

Wunderlich, John

X

7

Williams, Christopher

X

Non-Voting

Participant

Attending

1

Auld, Lorrayne

2

Aronson Mark

3

Balfanz, Dirk

4

Brudnicki, David

5

D'Agostino, Salvatore

6

Dowtin, Jazzmine

7

Dutta, Tim

8

Flanagan, Heather

9

Fleenor, Judith

10

Glasscock, Amy

11

Gropper, Adrian

12

Hodges, Gail

13

Jordaan, Loffie

X

14

LeVasseur, Lisa

15

Lopez, Cristina Timon

16

Pasquale, Jim

17

Snell, Oliver

18

Stowell, Therese

19

Sutor, Hannah

20

Tamanini, Greg

21

Vachino, Maria

22

Whysel, Noreen

Goals

  • Check-in on work progress

  • Review draft outline and status of writing tasks

Discussion items (AKA Agenda)

Time

Item

Who

Notes

5 min.

  • Start the meeting.

  • Call to order.

  • Approve minute

  • Approve agenda

John Wunderlich

Called to order: 13:05

Quorum reached: No

Minutes to approve: Yes

2023-12-13 Meeting notes - Draft

5 min.

Open Tasks Review

All

Task report
spacesPEMCP
isMissingRequiredParameterstrue
labelsmeeting-notes

5 min

Implementor’s Guidance Report has been published

John Wunderlich

Thanks to Amanda at Kantara. As promised, the PEMC report has been published on Kantara's Reports and Recommendations page.

The direct link to the report is as follows:

https://kantarainitiative.org/download/pemc-implementors-guidance-report/

15 min

Yearly Administration Tasks

Leadership Elections

Because quorum was not achieved, we agreed to distribute this as an email ballot, to be completed by

Nominations

Chair: John Wunderlich

Co-Chair: Christopher Williams

Secretary: vacant

Other nominations

Results

Chair:

Co-Chair:

Secretary:

Charter Renewal

Discussion: No reason for update raised. Last updated in mid 2023

10 minutes

Requirements Report

John Wunderlich

Discussion of next phase, starting with a review of the draft requirements report.

Proposed workflow is the following:

Status
titleDraft
When a requirement is first added to the Google Doc, it is in draft.

Status
colourBlue
titleSubmitted
When a requirement is ready to be discussed by the group and is on the agenda for a workgroup meeting it is moved to submitted status at that meeting. A link to the meeting note or notes where the requirement is discussed is added to the requirement in the document. Also, individuals may take on tasks related to the requirement which will be tracked in the Google Doc.

Status
colourYellow
titleUnder Review
Once a requirement has been discussed at a meeting, it is Under Review until the workgroup completes the discussion and changes to the requirement. When that is done the workgroup will vote or reach consensus that the requirement should either be included in the recommendation report or excluded.

Status
colourGreen
titleCandidate
Discussion on the requirement is complete and it will be part of the recommendation report.

Status
colourRed
titleExcluded
Discussion on the requirement is complete and it will not be part of the recommendation report.

Adjourn


13:27

Next meeting

Action items

  •