Date
Mar 17, 2014
...
Mark: We need to clarify the modes and spaces of discussion for all future members; need to be explicit about integrating contributions in CISWG; the CISWG is important because only a small number of people work on the Consent Receipt and Registry, but everything else belongs on Open Notice; Hugo mentioned that he favours an open source model, but this is too broad for what can be projected from this project, so we need to have a discussion about what part of the project will be open source and what will be usable for profit by existing membersis open and how it will be open.
Valentino: We have joined on the Internet under a common cause and shared global vision, but the business model is not common to all members; Consent Receipt has features that are interesting to each member, so it might be beneficial for contributing members to outline their interests and contributions to the project
Mark: The Receipt is certainly very complex terrain with multiple interests, and the registry is all the more viable as a business model, but we need to protect the collective work so that no other person or company can claim ownership or create a license over it, allowing preventing us from being able to engage with companies and eventual clients in a fair way eventually, the Kantara agreement offers that protection
...
Mark: We definitely have a lot of work to do in terms of the withdrawing consent, but many jurisdictions require that this be done in writing so this echoes that we need to develop a minimum cross-jurisdiction method
Action Items