...
- Do companies have to respond to query within jurisdictional context, and how about cross-jurisdictionally?
- Dazaah Greenwood (MIT) highlight trade association as a venue to channel the consent receipt request through. Leads to points: What companies need to respond to and why? Legal necessities for companies.
- Let's let them (companies and trade associations) highlight what issues they have with the consent receip request
- John highlights specific context of California that gives us reason to leverage our request there
- Mary is bringing up value of jurisdictional case law and re-enforces the standard reason why there is incentive for us
- Innis: Need to point to something concrete within jurisdiction to ensure company compliance
- Mark: Pull in regional and international standards as well as jurisdictional law
- Innis: If we are challenged, we need a more concrete rebuttal to offer companies seeking to reject jurisdiction (we need an actual case rather than airing privacy rights en masse); we need the basis as a referencedecision
- Mark: Let's map the UK version onto the US/California version and see where we can build and differentiate on the two
...
- Mary: Re wide use, the "consent receipt" is now in the public domain and within 'ownership' of the ON group so IP contributors can engage it publicly but there is no individual exclusive claim for profit; companies success for reasons beyond the technology we are developing; from the view of the user, it is beneficial to have a ubiquitous product that becomes a standard
- Mark: There is a difficult challenge in deciding what IP goes in and what goes out, but it widely marketable and Valentino is highlighting that
- Mary: Need to go over Kantara Agreement to highlight any issues and obligations, specific call next week or Thursday (integrating it into wider call, holding it in widest forum); Thursday
- Tuesday next week
Discussion Item 3: UK Consent Receipt
...