Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Date

September 29, 2016

Info

Meeting notes approved: 2016-10-20 Meeting Notes (CR)

 

Attendees

Goals

  • Review current draft of CR Spec and give feedback to editor to feed into the work
  • Discuss specific topics that will require consensus decisions from the WG

 

Discussion Items

TimeItemWhoNotes
5 min
  • Roll call
  • Agenda bashing
  • Minutes Approval
Former user (Deleted)
  • Prior minutes requiring approval

2016-09-22 Meeting Notes (Consent Receipts)

2016-09-15 Meeting Notes (Consent Receipts)

2016-09-08 Meeting Notes (Consent Receipts)

2016-09-08 Meeting Notes (Consent Receipts)

"Move to approve listed meeting notes previously circulated"

Motion: Deferred - insufficient attendance of attendees of the listed meetings to confirm notes

Second:

Discussion:

Result:

25 minFormer user (Deleted)

KI-CR09-DRAFT-2016-09-24.doc (confluence attachment)

KI-CR09-DRAFT-2016-09-24 (Google doc)

 

  • David gave an update on the current draft status
  • Working on structure of the document to simplify and reduce complexity of the document presentation
  • David has sent the list of current issues to the list for feedback
  • Mary is working with a company now - usability studies and eventually a consent receipt
25 min
  • Discussion on 'content' item needing consensus decision
All

Implementation and interpretation questions that David posted to WG list

  1. MyData submitted some comments. I added them to the 0.9 doc as comments starting with "From MyData":
    • Consent Time Stamp
    • Collection Method
    • Jurisdiction
    • PII Controller Org 
    • PII Controller Contact 
    • Privacy Policy
    • Version
    • CR GUID
    • Public Key - description and data type
    • PII Controller address - data type
    • PII Controller email - data type
  2. Resolve multiple definitions. These terms have two or more definitions. It's OK to have one normative definition and to include the other definitions as notes. 
    • purpose
    • sensitive PII
    • use
  3. Resolve multiple terms. There should only be one normative term. The other can be mentioned in a note:
    • expressed vs. explicit
    • implied vs. implicit
  4. I need clarification on "Consent Type". 
  5. What is the difference between PII Controller and Company/Organization?
  6. Consistent use of terms. I propose to change all occurrences of:
    • "sensitive data" to "sensitive PII"
    • "data controller" to "PII Controller"
    • "PII Subject" to "PII Principal"
  7. I propose removing Appendix C. 
  8. I recommending adding a human readable CR example based on the same information used in Appendix D. 

Action Items




CR Spec publication schedule

Current: call for comments on draft spec commences

...