...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
Date
2017-04-13
Status of Minutes
DRAFTApproved
Approved at: <<Insert link to minutes showing approval>> 2019-12-12 Meeting notes (CR) DRAFT
Attendees
Voting
- Andrew Hughes
- John Wunderlich
- Mark Lizar
- Jim Pasquale
Non-Voting
- Robert Lapes
- David Turner
| Info |
|---|
|
Participant Roster (2016) - Quorum is 4 of 7 as of 2016-10-06 Iain Henderson, Mary Hodder, Harri Honko, MarkLizar, Jim Pasquale, John Wunderlich, Andrew Hughes |
Discussion Items
Not enough attendees to conduct the meeting. Agenda items deferred to next week.
|
|
| 1 min | | All | Please review these blogs offline for current status on Kantara and all the DG/WG: |
| 1 min | - Status of Consent Receipt Specification v1
| | - LC has certified the draft as meeting the requirements stated in the Bylaws and Operating Procedures
- Staff is preparing to send to All Member ballot
- It may be prudent to contact your own networks to encourage them to vote - I can disclose Kantara member names directly with each individually (not email addresses - so you have to know that part yourself)
-
|
| 10 min | - Recap the Discussion of approach
| All | - FROM 2017-03-23 MEETING NOTES:
- - discuss approach and schedule for next round of specification enhancements
- a contributions period
- a period of consolidation and combination of the contributions
- a period of WG Editor work
- Public review etc
- confirmation of change request tracking tool (GitHub Issues unless strong objection)
Harri - Their EU-based lawyer commented that the CR v1.0 draft has elements that are based on UK/US Common Law, rather than civil codes (GDPR)
- e.g. Consents have to be better atomized - so that over time, is there an accumulation of receipts? or accumulation of consents?
- The implementation detail might be: is there a concept of dynamic evaluation of consented purposes? Or is it static at transaction time? e.g. if a purpose or consent is changed at a later date, are the original receipts canceled and re-issued? is the original updated? is there a 'diff' receipt that only covers the different scope?
- Mary
- The caution about "Purposes lists" and "Sensitive data types" needs to be resolved - must be very cautious about how these are displayed to the user, especially if it's sensitive data - need to create recommendations
- Mark
- Need to set up a backlog - and define a work plan and schedule
- Set a date for CR v1.1
- Need to write guidance on spec usage
- Need consensus on
- Prioritization of backlog
- Need to consider any issues that are used for GDPR implementation
- The original agreement was to do 6-month epics
- Andrew to try to get the comments from the public review into github
|
| 40 min | Discuss work backlog priorities for CR v1.1 | All | Consent Receipt v1.1 Work Backlog - Discussed items 1-11 on the CR v1.1 backlog list
|
| 5 min | Update on Comments to ICO Consent Drafts | Mark | - Mark received some contributions and submitted the package - receipt was acknowledged
|